Orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners.

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-14 DOI:10.5402/2012/657973
Carl T Drake, Susan P McGorray, Calogero Dolce, Madhu Nair, Timothy T Wheeler
{"title":"Orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners.","authors":"Carl T Drake,&nbsp;Susan P McGorray,&nbsp;Calogero Dolce,&nbsp;Madhu Nair,&nbsp;Timothy T Wheeler","doi":"10.5402/2012/657973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clear aligners provide a convenient model to measure orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). We examined the role of in vivo aligner material fatigue and subject-specific factors in tooth movement. Fifteen subjects seeking orthodontic treatment at the University of Florida were enrolled. Results were compared with data previously collected from 37 subjects enrolled in a similar protocol. Subjects were followed prospectively for eight weeks. An upper central incisor was programmed to move 0.5 mm. every two weeks using clear aligners. A duplicate aligner was provided for the second week of each cycle. Weekly polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions were taken, and digital models were fabricated to measure OTM. Initial and final cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained to characterize OTM. Results were compared to data from a similar protocol, where subjects received a new aligner biweekly. No significant difference was found in the amount of OTM between the two groups, with mean total OTM of 1.11 mm. (standard deviation (SD) 0.30) and 1.07 mm. (SD 0.33) for the weekly aligner and biweekly control groups, respectively (P = 0.72). Over eight weeks, in two-week intervals, material fatigue does not play a significant role in the rate or amount of tooth movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2012 ","pages":"657973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/657973","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/657973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Clear aligners provide a convenient model to measure orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). We examined the role of in vivo aligner material fatigue and subject-specific factors in tooth movement. Fifteen subjects seeking orthodontic treatment at the University of Florida were enrolled. Results were compared with data previously collected from 37 subjects enrolled in a similar protocol. Subjects were followed prospectively for eight weeks. An upper central incisor was programmed to move 0.5 mm. every two weeks using clear aligners. A duplicate aligner was provided for the second week of each cycle. Weekly polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions were taken, and digital models were fabricated to measure OTM. Initial and final cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained to characterize OTM. Results were compared to data from a similar protocol, where subjects received a new aligner biweekly. No significant difference was found in the amount of OTM between the two groups, with mean total OTM of 1.11 mm. (standard deviation (SD) 0.30) and 1.07 mm. (SD 0.33) for the weekly aligner and biweekly control groups, respectively (P = 0.72). Over eight weeks, in two-week intervals, material fatigue does not play a significant role in the rate or amount of tooth movement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用清晰的矫正器矫正牙齿。
矫正器为测量正畸牙齿运动(OTM)提供了一种方便的模型。我们研究了体内矫正器材料疲劳和受试者特定因素在牙齿运动中的作用。15名在佛罗里达大学寻求正畸治疗的受试者被招募。结果与先前从37名参加类似方案的受试者中收集的数据进行了比较。受试者被前瞻性地随访了8周。上中切牙被编程移动0.5毫米。每两周使用一次牙齿矫正器。每个周期的第二周提供一个重复的对准器。每周取聚氯乙烯硅氧烷(PVS)印痕,并制作数字模型来测量OTM。获得初始和最终锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像来表征OTM。结果与来自类似方案的数据进行了比较,在该方案中,受试者每两周接受一次新的校准器。两组间脑外膜厚度差异无统计学意义,平均总脑外膜厚度为1.11 mm。(标准差(SD) 0.30)和1.07 mm。(SD 0.33),每周矫正组和双周对照组的差异有统计学意义(P = 0.72)。超过八周,在两周的间隔中,材料疲劳对牙齿运动的速度或数量不起重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信