The impact of development of population-based study in the biomedical field on laws and regulations: a cross-strait experience on biobank development.

Fan Chien Te, Wu Chunyan, Shi Zhiyuan
{"title":"The impact of development of population-based study in the biomedical field on laws and regulations: a cross-strait experience on biobank development.","authors":"Fan Chien Te,&nbsp;Wu Chunyan,&nbsp;Shi Zhiyuan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Together with the completion of the Human Genome Project, biomedical research has marched into the \"Post-Genomic Era.\" In order to take advantage of this extracted gene related information extensively and precisely so as to realize man's biological phenomena as well as the mechanism of pathogenesis, consequentially, a large scale sample collection of different geological areas and/or ethnic groups becomes necessary for the future population based genetic research of a country and, in turn, the construction of population-based genetic database (Biobank). In recent years, both mainland China and Taiwan have not only made great progress in information and computation technologies, but have also gradually taken a close look into the quality of medicine delivery. Thus, it becomes unavoidable for both sides to create each one's population-based genetic databases (Biobank). Theoretically speaking, the Biobank development shall benefit the study on the correlation between genes and disease and also the solution for disease treatment as well. At the same time, medical diagnostic technology has also been significantly improved. It is believable that the population-based genetic database might be utilized to promote medical quality and to reduce the cost of public health delivery. Further; in the near future, it might become the \"raw materials \"for medical research application. However when taking promotion of public welfare as the premises for a Biobank development, the severe and multi challenge occurred against the traditional legal rules in terms of the privacy protection, public trust development, the compliance of informed consent principle, the implementation of benefit-sharing doctrine and the possible discrimination concern about the population/participants selection and some other ELSI issues. In this paper, the major legal issues encountered by the Biobank development will first be reviewed accompanied by the background information concerning the Biobank development scenario crossing the Taiwan Strait. Also, mainly following the realm of comparative policy or legal approaches, the paper learning from the fruits of this comparative study, tries to propose some recommendations for future legislative consideration by both mainland China and Taiwan. It's been this author's wish that, when establishing a large scale population based Biobank, the promotion of public trust shall be placed as the primary goal together with the emphasis on supporting publicity and transparency on the administrative practices, so as to encourage the public participation in observing the principle of altruism and, in turn, benefit the future biomedicine development.</p>","PeriodicalId":81629,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics","volume":"23 2","pages":"143-63, 181-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Together with the completion of the Human Genome Project, biomedical research has marched into the "Post-Genomic Era." In order to take advantage of this extracted gene related information extensively and precisely so as to realize man's biological phenomena as well as the mechanism of pathogenesis, consequentially, a large scale sample collection of different geological areas and/or ethnic groups becomes necessary for the future population based genetic research of a country and, in turn, the construction of population-based genetic database (Biobank). In recent years, both mainland China and Taiwan have not only made great progress in information and computation technologies, but have also gradually taken a close look into the quality of medicine delivery. Thus, it becomes unavoidable for both sides to create each one's population-based genetic databases (Biobank). Theoretically speaking, the Biobank development shall benefit the study on the correlation between genes and disease and also the solution for disease treatment as well. At the same time, medical diagnostic technology has also been significantly improved. It is believable that the population-based genetic database might be utilized to promote medical quality and to reduce the cost of public health delivery. Further; in the near future, it might become the "raw materials "for medical research application. However when taking promotion of public welfare as the premises for a Biobank development, the severe and multi challenge occurred against the traditional legal rules in terms of the privacy protection, public trust development, the compliance of informed consent principle, the implementation of benefit-sharing doctrine and the possible discrimination concern about the population/participants selection and some other ELSI issues. In this paper, the major legal issues encountered by the Biobank development will first be reviewed accompanied by the background information concerning the Biobank development scenario crossing the Taiwan Strait. Also, mainly following the realm of comparative policy or legal approaches, the paper learning from the fruits of this comparative study, tries to propose some recommendations for future legislative consideration by both mainland China and Taiwan. It's been this author's wish that, when establishing a large scale population based Biobank, the promotion of public trust shall be placed as the primary goal together with the emphasis on supporting publicity and transparency on the administrative practices, so as to encourage the public participation in observing the principle of altruism and, in turn, benefit the future biomedicine development.

生物医学领域人口研究的发展对法律法规的影响:两岸生物库发展的经验。
随着人类基因组计划的完成,生物医学研究进入了“后基因组时代”。为了广泛、准确地利用这些提取出来的基因相关信息,从而了解人类的生物现象及其发病机制,未来一个国家基于人口的遗传研究就需要大量收集不同地质区域和/或民族的样本,进而建立基于人口的遗传数据库(Biobank)。近年来,中国大陆和台湾不仅在信息和计算技术方面取得了巨大进步,而且也逐渐密切关注药物交付的质量。因此,双方不可避免地要建立各自的种群遗传数据库(Biobank)。从理论上讲,生物库的发展有利于研究基因与疾病的相关性,也有利于疾病治疗的解决。与此同时,医疗诊断技术也有了明显的提高。基于人群的遗传数据库可以用来提高医疗质量和降低公共卫生服务的成本。进一步;在不久的将来,它可能成为医学研究应用的“原材料”。然而,当以促进公共福利为前提发展生物银行时,在隐私保护、公众信任发展、知情同意原则的遵守、利益分享原则的实施以及在人群/参与者选择方面可能存在的歧视担忧等ELSI问题上,对传统法律规则产生了严峻和多重的挑战。本文将首先回顾生物样本库发展所遇到的主要法律问题,并介绍两岸生物样本库发展的背景资料。此外,本文主要从比较政策或法律的角度出发,借鉴比较研究的成果,试图提出一些建议,以供大陆和台湾未来的立法考虑。笔者希望在建立大规模的人口型生物银行时,以促进公众信任为首要目标,同时注重支持管理实践的公开透明,从而鼓励公众参与,遵循利他主义原则,从而有利于未来生物医学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书