Critical appraisal of the Spanner™ prostatic stent in the treatment of prostatic obstruction.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-02-09 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S7107
Patrick McKenzie, Gopal Badlani
{"title":"Critical appraisal of the Spanner™ prostatic stent in the treatment of prostatic obstruction.","authors":"Patrick McKenzie, Gopal Badlani","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S7107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Spanner™ stent was first used in patients to relieve bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), and has recently been used in patients following transurethral microwave thermotherapy and men unfit for surgical intervention. We review the current literature on the role of the Spanner stent in treating prostatic obstruction compared to previously reported cases involving the use of temporary stents. The Spanner stent has been found to be successful in treating patients with bladder outlet obstruction from benign prostatic hyperplasia and following high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). Patients with the Spanner stent had an increase in peak flow rate and a decrease in post void residual and International Prostate Symptom Scores. In patients treated with TUMT, quality of life measures indicate that the Spanner stent shows increased ease of bladder drainage, decreased leakage, and no adverse effect on daily activities. In patients unfit for surgery, however, there was increased retention and pain requiring stent removal in 63% of cases. The Spanner stent offers ease of insertion with a decrease in voiding symptoms in selected patients. Based on limited data, the Spanner stent has been recommended as a treatment option for men with BOO following TUMT. However, it is not a good treatment option for men unfit for surgery based on an increased incidence of urinary retention and dysuria. The Spanner stent is the only currently approved temporary stent and, based on a literature review, it does not offer significant advantage over previously used temporary stents. It is notable that most researchers have not evaluated the role of detrusor function on the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":" ","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S7107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Spanner™ stent was first used in patients to relieve bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), and has recently been used in patients following transurethral microwave thermotherapy and men unfit for surgical intervention. We review the current literature on the role of the Spanner stent in treating prostatic obstruction compared to previously reported cases involving the use of temporary stents. The Spanner stent has been found to be successful in treating patients with bladder outlet obstruction from benign prostatic hyperplasia and following high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). Patients with the Spanner stent had an increase in peak flow rate and a decrease in post void residual and International Prostate Symptom Scores. In patients treated with TUMT, quality of life measures indicate that the Spanner stent shows increased ease of bladder drainage, decreased leakage, and no adverse effect on daily activities. In patients unfit for surgery, however, there was increased retention and pain requiring stent removal in 63% of cases. The Spanner stent offers ease of insertion with a decrease in voiding symptoms in selected patients. Based on limited data, the Spanner stent has been recommended as a treatment option for men with BOO following TUMT. However, it is not a good treatment option for men unfit for surgery based on an increased incidence of urinary retention and dysuria. The Spanner stent is the only currently approved temporary stent and, based on a literature review, it does not offer significant advantage over previously used temporary stents. It is notable that most researchers have not evaluated the role of detrusor function on the outcomes.

对用于治疗前列腺梗阻的 Spanner™ 前列腺支架的严格评估。
Spanner™支架最早用于缓解膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的患者,最近又用于经尿道微波热疗后的患者和不适合手术治疗的男性。我们回顾了目前关于斯潘纳支架在治疗前列腺梗阻中的作用的文献,并与之前报道的使用临时支架的病例进行了比较。Spanner支架在治疗良性前列腺增生引起的膀胱出口梗阻和高能经尿道微波热疗(TUMT)后的患者方面取得了成功。使用斯潘纳支架的患者峰值流速增加,排尿后残余尿量和国际前列腺症状评分下降。在接受 TUMT 治疗的患者中,生活质量测量结果显示,Spanner 支架提高了膀胱引流的便利性,减少了漏尿,并且对日常活动没有不良影响。然而,在不适合手术的患者中,63%的病例会出现潴留和疼痛,需要移除支架。Spanner 支架易于插入,可减少特定患者的排尿症状。根据有限的数据,Spanner 支架已被推荐为治疗 TUMT 后出现 BOO 的男性患者的一种选择。然而,对于不适合手术的男性来说,由于尿潴留和排尿困难的发生率增加,这种治疗方法并不理想。Spanner 支架是目前唯一获批的临时支架,根据文献综述,它与之前使用的临时支架相比并无明显优势。值得注意的是,大多数研究人员都没有评估排尿功能对疗效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信