Somatic therapies for treatment-resistant depression: ECT, TMS, VNS, DBS.

Cristina Cusin, Darin D Dougherty
{"title":"Somatic therapies for treatment-resistant depression: ECT, TMS, VNS, DBS.","authors":"Cristina Cusin,&nbsp;Darin D Dougherty","doi":"10.1186/2045-5380-2-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of non-pharmacological therapies for treatment resistant depression (TRD) is rapidly evolving and new somatic therapies are valuable options for patients who have failed numerous other treatments. A major challenge for clinicians (and patients alike) is how to integrate the results from published clinical trials in the clinical decision-making process.We reviewed the literature for articles reporting results for clinical trials in particular efficacy data, contraindications and side effects of somatic therapies including electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Each of these devices has an indication for patients with different level of treatment resistance, based on acuteness of illness, likelihood of response, costs and associated risks. ECT is widely available and its effects are relatively rapid in severe TRD, but its cognitive adverse effects may be cumbersome. TMS is safe and well tolerated, and it has been approved by FDA for adults who have failed to respond to one antidepressant, but its use in TRD is still controversial as it is not supported by rigorous double-blind randomized clinical trials. The options requiring surgical approach are VNS and DBS. VNS has been FDA-approved for TRD, however it is not indicated for management of acute illness. DBS for TRD is still an experimental area of investigation and double-blind clinical trials are underway.</p>","PeriodicalId":89532,"journal":{"name":"Biology of mood & anxiety disorders","volume":"2 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2045-5380-2-14","citationCount":"86","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of mood & anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-5380-2-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

Abstract

The field of non-pharmacological therapies for treatment resistant depression (TRD) is rapidly evolving and new somatic therapies are valuable options for patients who have failed numerous other treatments. A major challenge for clinicians (and patients alike) is how to integrate the results from published clinical trials in the clinical decision-making process.We reviewed the literature for articles reporting results for clinical trials in particular efficacy data, contraindications and side effects of somatic therapies including electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Each of these devices has an indication for patients with different level of treatment resistance, based on acuteness of illness, likelihood of response, costs and associated risks. ECT is widely available and its effects are relatively rapid in severe TRD, but its cognitive adverse effects may be cumbersome. TMS is safe and well tolerated, and it has been approved by FDA for adults who have failed to respond to one antidepressant, but its use in TRD is still controversial as it is not supported by rigorous double-blind randomized clinical trials. The options requiring surgical approach are VNS and DBS. VNS has been FDA-approved for TRD, however it is not indicated for management of acute illness. DBS for TRD is still an experimental area of investigation and double-blind clinical trials are underway.

治疗难治性抑郁症的躯体疗法:ECT, TMS, VNS, DBS。
治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的非药物治疗领域正在迅速发展,新的躯体疗法是许多其他治疗失败的患者的宝贵选择。临床医生(和患者一样)面临的一个主要挑战是如何将已发表的临床试验结果整合到临床决策过程中。我们回顾了报道临床试验结果的文献,特别是电痉挛治疗(ECT)、经颅磁刺激(TMS)、迷走神经刺激(VNS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)等躯体疗法的疗效数据、禁忌症和副作用。根据病情的严重程度、反应的可能性、费用和相关风险,这些设备中的每一种都有不同程度的治疗抵抗患者的适应症。ECT广泛应用,对严重TRD的疗效相对较快,但其认知不良反应可能很麻烦。经颅磁刺激是安全且耐受性良好的,它已被FDA批准用于对一种抗抑郁药无效的成年人,但它在TRD中的应用仍然存在争议,因为它没有得到严格的双盲随机临床试验的支持。需要手术入路的选择是VNS和DBS。VNS已被fda批准用于TRD,但不适用于急性疾病的治疗。DBS治疗TRD仍是一个实验研究领域,双盲临床试验正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书