Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma.

Kaweh Mansouri, Felipe A Medeiros, Ali Tafreshi, Robert N Weinreb
{"title":"Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma.","authors":"Kaweh Mansouri,&nbsp;Felipe A Medeiros,&nbsp;Ali Tafreshi,&nbsp;Robert N Weinreb","doi":"10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE To examine the safety, tolerability, and reproducibility of intraocular pressure (IOP) patterns during repeated continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring with a contact lens sensor. METHODS Forty patients suspected of having glaucoma (n = 21) or with established glaucoma (n = 19) were studied. Patients participated in two 24-hour IOP monitoring sessions (S1 and S2) at a 1-week interval (SENSIMED Triggerfish CLS; Sensimed AG). Patients pursued daily activities, and sleep behavior was not controlled. Incidence of adverse events and tolerability (visual analog scale score) were assessed. Reproducibility of signal patterns was assessed using Pearson correlations. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the patients was 55.5 (15.7) years, and 60% were male. Main adverse events were blurred vision (82%), conjunctival hyperemia (80%), and superficial punctate keratitis (15%). The mean (SD) visual analog scale score was 27.2 (18.5) mm in S1 and 23.8 (18.7) mm in S2 (P = .22). Overall correlation between the 2 sessions was 0.59 (0.51 for no glaucoma medication and 0.63 for glaucoma medication) (P = .12). Mean (SD) positive linear slopes of the sensor signal from wake to 2 hours into sleep were detected in both sessions for the no glaucoma medication group (S1: 0.40 [0.34], P &lt; .001; S2: 0.33 [0.30], P &lt; .01) but not for the glaucoma medication group (S1: 0.24 [0.60], P = .06; S2: 0.40 [0.40], P &lt; .001). CONCLUSIONS Repeated use of the contact lens sensor demonstrated good safety and tolerability. The recorded IOP patterns showed fair to good reproducibility, suggesting that data from continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring may be useful in the management of patients with glaucoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01319617.</p>","PeriodicalId":8303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of ophthalmology","volume":"130 12","pages":"1534-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2280","citationCount":"174","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 174

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the safety, tolerability, and reproducibility of intraocular pressure (IOP) patterns during repeated continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring with a contact lens sensor. METHODS Forty patients suspected of having glaucoma (n = 21) or with established glaucoma (n = 19) were studied. Patients participated in two 24-hour IOP monitoring sessions (S1 and S2) at a 1-week interval (SENSIMED Triggerfish CLS; Sensimed AG). Patients pursued daily activities, and sleep behavior was not controlled. Incidence of adverse events and tolerability (visual analog scale score) were assessed. Reproducibility of signal patterns was assessed using Pearson correlations. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the patients was 55.5 (15.7) years, and 60% were male. Main adverse events were blurred vision (82%), conjunctival hyperemia (80%), and superficial punctate keratitis (15%). The mean (SD) visual analog scale score was 27.2 (18.5) mm in S1 and 23.8 (18.7) mm in S2 (P = .22). Overall correlation between the 2 sessions was 0.59 (0.51 for no glaucoma medication and 0.63 for glaucoma medication) (P = .12). Mean (SD) positive linear slopes of the sensor signal from wake to 2 hours into sleep were detected in both sessions for the no glaucoma medication group (S1: 0.40 [0.34], P < .001; S2: 0.33 [0.30], P < .01) but not for the glaucoma medication group (S1: 0.24 [0.60], P = .06; S2: 0.40 [0.40], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Repeated use of the contact lens sensor demonstrated good safety and tolerability. The recorded IOP patterns showed fair to good reproducibility, suggesting that data from continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring may be useful in the management of patients with glaucoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01319617.

用隐形眼镜传感器连续24小时监测眼压模式:青光眼患者的安全性、耐受性和可重复性
目的探讨隐形眼镜传感器连续24小时反复监测眼内压(IOP)模式的安全性、耐受性和可重复性。方法对40例疑似青光眼(21例)和已确诊青光眼(19例)患者进行分析。患者每隔1周参加2次24小时IOP监测(S1和S2) (SENSIMED Triggerfish CLS;Sensimed AG)。患者追求日常活动,睡眠行为不受控制。评估不良事件发生率和耐受性(视觉模拟量表评分)。使用Pearson相关性评估信号模式的可重复性。结果患者平均(SD)年龄为55.5(15.7)岁,男性占60%。主要不良事件为视力模糊(82%)、结膜充血(80%)和浅表性点状角膜炎(15%)。平均(SD)视觉模拟量表评分S1为27.2 (18.5)mm, S2为23.8 (18.7)mm (P = 0.22)。两组间的总体相关性为0.59(未使用青光眼药物组为0.51,使用青光眼药物组为0.63)(P = 0.12)。无青光眼药物治疗组从清醒到进入睡眠2小时传感器信号的平均(SD)正线性斜率均在两个疗程中检测到(S1: 0.40 [0.34], P <措施;S2: 0.33 [0.30], P;青光眼用药组无统计学意义(S1: 0.24 [0.60], P = .06;[2] [0.40], P <措施)。结论重复使用隐形眼镜传感器具有良好的安全性和耐受性。记录的IOP模式具有良好的可重复性,提示连续24小时IOP监测的数据可能对青光眼患者的治疗有用。试验注册clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01319617。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of ophthalmology
Archives of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信