Selective resection of dorsal nerves of penis for premature ejaculation

G.-X. Zhang, L.-P. Yu, W.-J. Bai, X.-F. Wang
{"title":"Selective resection of dorsal nerves of penis for premature ejaculation","authors":"G.-X. Zhang,&nbsp;L.-P. Yu,&nbsp;W.-J. Bai,&nbsp;X.-F. Wang","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01296.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Premature ejaculation (PE) is one of the most prevalent male sexual dysfunctions. Selective resection of the dorsal nerve (SRDN) of penis has recently been used for the treatment of PE and has shown some efficacy. To further clarify the efficacy and safety of SRDN on PE, we performed a preliminary, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical observational study. Persons with the complaints of rapid ejaculation, asking for circumcision because of redundant foreskin, intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) within 2 min, not responding to antidepressant medication or disliking oral medication were randomly enrolled in two groups. From April 2007 to August 2010, a total of 101 eligible persons were enrolled, 40 of them received SRDN which dorsal nerves of the penis were selectively resected, and those (<i>n </i>= 61) enrolled in the control group were circumcised only. IELT and the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BMSFI) questionnaire were implemented pre- and post-operatively for the evaluation of the effect and safety of the surgery. There are no statistically significant differences in the baseline data including mean ages, mean IELTs, perceived control abilities and the BMSFI mean scores between the two groups. With regard to the post-operative data of the surgery, both IELTs and perceived control abilities were significantly increased after SRDN (1.1 ± 0.9 min vs. 3.8 ± 3.1 min for pre- and post-operative IELT, respectively, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.01),whereas the post-operative results were not significantly improved for the control group (1.2 ± 0.7 min vs. 1.5 ± 1.1 min, <i>p </i>&gt; 0.05). Also, there were no statistically significant differences both in BMSFI composite and subscale scores between the two groups after surgery. Hence, we conclude that SRDN is effective in delaying ejaculation and improving ejaculatory control, whereas erectile function is not affected. The results imply that SRDN may be an alternative method for the treatment of PE for some patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13890,"journal":{"name":"International journal of andrology","volume":"35 6","pages":"873-879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01296.x","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01296.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Premature ejaculation (PE) is one of the most prevalent male sexual dysfunctions. Selective resection of the dorsal nerve (SRDN) of penis has recently been used for the treatment of PE and has shown some efficacy. To further clarify the efficacy and safety of SRDN on PE, we performed a preliminary, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical observational study. Persons with the complaints of rapid ejaculation, asking for circumcision because of redundant foreskin, intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) within 2 min, not responding to antidepressant medication or disliking oral medication were randomly enrolled in two groups. From April 2007 to August 2010, a total of 101 eligible persons were enrolled, 40 of them received SRDN which dorsal nerves of the penis were selectively resected, and those (n = 61) enrolled in the control group were circumcised only. IELT and the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BMSFI) questionnaire were implemented pre- and post-operatively for the evaluation of the effect and safety of the surgery. There are no statistically significant differences in the baseline data including mean ages, mean IELTs, perceived control abilities and the BMSFI mean scores between the two groups. With regard to the post-operative data of the surgery, both IELTs and perceived control abilities were significantly increased after SRDN (1.1 ± 0.9 min vs. 3.8 ± 3.1 min for pre- and post-operative IELT, respectively, p < 0.01),whereas the post-operative results were not significantly improved for the control group (1.2 ± 0.7 min vs. 1.5 ± 1.1 min, p > 0.05). Also, there were no statistically significant differences both in BMSFI composite and subscale scores between the two groups after surgery. Hence, we conclude that SRDN is effective in delaying ejaculation and improving ejaculatory control, whereas erectile function is not affected. The results imply that SRDN may be an alternative method for the treatment of PE for some patients.

Abstract Image

选择性阴茎背神经切除治疗早泄
早泄(PE)是最常见的男性性功能障碍之一。选择性切除阴茎背神经(SRDN)最近被用于治疗PE,并显示出一定的疗效。为了进一步明确SRDN治疗PE的有效性和安全性,我们进行了一项初步的、随机的、安慰剂对照的临床观察性研究。有射精快速、包皮过多要求包皮环切、阴道内射精潜伏期(雅思)小于2分钟、抗抑郁药物无效或不喜欢口服药物的患者随机分为两组。2007年4月至2010年8月,共纳入101例符合条件的患者,其中40例接受SRDN,选择性切除阴茎背神经,对照组(n = 61)仅行包皮环切术。术前和术后分别进行雅思和简短男性性功能量表(BMSFI)问卷调查,以评估手术的效果和安全性。两组的基线数据包括平均年龄、平均雅思成绩、感知控制能力和BMSFI平均得分,差异无统计学意义。术后数据方面,SRDN后雅思和感知控制能力均显著提高(雅思术前1.1±0.9 min vs.雅思术后3.8±3.1 min, p < 0.01),而对照组术后成绩无显著改善(雅思术前1.2±0.7 min vs.雅思术后1.5±1.1 min, p < 0.05)。两组术后BMSFI综合评分及亚量表评分差异无统计学意义。因此,我们得出结论,SRDN在延迟射精和改善射精控制方面是有效的,而勃起功能不受影响。结果表明SRDN可能是一些PE患者治疗的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信