Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy before and after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Review.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-18 DOI:10.1155/2012/791873
Mitsushige Sugimoto, Jin Seok Jang, Yashiro Yoshizawa, Satoshi Osawa, Ken Sugimoto, Yoshihiko Sato, Takahisa Furuta
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy before and after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Review.","authors":"Mitsushige Sugimoto,&nbsp;Jin Seok Jang,&nbsp;Yashiro Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Satoshi Osawa,&nbsp;Ken Sugimoto,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Sato,&nbsp;Takahisa Furuta","doi":"10.1155/2012/791873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel endoscopic procedure first developed in the 1990s which enables en bloc resection of gastric neoplastic lesions that are difficult to resect via conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. However, given that ESD increases the risk of intra- and post-ESD delayed bleeding and that platelet aggregation and coagulation in artificial ulcers after ESD strongly depend on intragastric pH, faster and stronger acid inhibition via proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) as well as endoscopic hemostasis by thermocoagulation during ESD have been used to prevent ESD-related bleeding. Because PPIs more potently inhibit acid secretion than H(2)RAs, they are often the first-line drugs employed in ESD treatment. However, acid inhibition after the initial infusion of a PPI is weaker in the early phase than that achievable with H(2)RAs; further, PPI effectiveness can vary depending on genetic differences in CYP2C19. Therefore, optimal acid inhibition may require tailored treatment based on CYP2C19 genotype when ESD is performed, with a concomitant infusion of PPI and H(2)RA possibly most effective for patients with the rapid metabolizer CYP2C19 genotype, while PPI alone may be sufficient for those with the intermediate or poor metabolizer genotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11288,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","volume":"2012 ","pages":"791873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/791873","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/791873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel endoscopic procedure first developed in the 1990s which enables en bloc resection of gastric neoplastic lesions that are difficult to resect via conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. However, given that ESD increases the risk of intra- and post-ESD delayed bleeding and that platelet aggregation and coagulation in artificial ulcers after ESD strongly depend on intragastric pH, faster and stronger acid inhibition via proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) as well as endoscopic hemostasis by thermocoagulation during ESD have been used to prevent ESD-related bleeding. Because PPIs more potently inhibit acid secretion than H(2)RAs, they are often the first-line drugs employed in ESD treatment. However, acid inhibition after the initial infusion of a PPI is weaker in the early phase than that achievable with H(2)RAs; further, PPI effectiveness can vary depending on genetic differences in CYP2C19. Therefore, optimal acid inhibition may require tailored treatment based on CYP2C19 genotype when ESD is performed, with a concomitant infusion of PPI and H(2)RA possibly most effective for patients with the rapid metabolizer CYP2C19 genotype, while PPI alone may be sufficient for those with the intermediate or poor metabolizer genotypes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜下粘膜剥离前后质子泵抑制剂治疗:综述。
内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是20世纪90年代首次发展起来的一种新型内镜手术,可以对常规内镜粘膜切除术难以切除的胃肿瘤病灶进行整体切除。然而,鉴于ESD增加了ESD内和ESD后延迟出血的风险,并且ESD后人工溃疡的血小板聚集和凝固强烈依赖于胃内pH值,因此,通过质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和组胺2受体拮抗剂(H(2)RAs)更快、更强的酸抑制以及ESD期间的内镜下热凝止血已被用于预防ESD相关出血。由于PPIs比H(2)RAs更有效地抑制酸分泌,因此它们通常是ESD治疗的一线药物。然而,与H(2)RAs相比,初始输注PPI后的早期酸抑制作用较弱;此外,PPI的有效性可能取决于CYP2C19基因的差异。因此,当进行ESD时,最佳的酸抑制可能需要基于CYP2C19基因型的定制治疗,同时输注PPI和H(2)RA可能对快速代谢CYP2C19基因型的患者最有效,而单独PPI可能对中间或差代谢基因型的患者足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信