Preventive role of wire-guided cannulation to reduce hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-15 DOI:10.1155/2012/821376
Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh, Esmaeil Shamsi Afzali, Siavash Zafar Doagoo, Mirhadi Mousavi, Dariush Mirsattari, Anahita Shahnazi, Mohammad Reza Zali
{"title":"Preventive role of wire-guided cannulation to reduce hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.","authors":"Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh,&nbsp;Esmaeil Shamsi Afzali,&nbsp;Siavash Zafar Doagoo,&nbsp;Mirhadi Mousavi,&nbsp;Dariush Mirsattari,&nbsp;Anahita Shahnazi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Zali","doi":"10.1155/2012/821376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and Study Aims. The usefulness of wire-guided cannulation for avoiding hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is conflicting, and therefore we designed this study to determine whether wire-guided cannulation reduces the rate of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis and compare its efficacy to conventional method. Patients and Methods. Seven hundred and forty-eight patients with hepatobiliary diseases consecutively underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP at the unit of Taleghani referral hospital in Tehran. Among them, 546 patients were eligible for wire-guided cannulation and underwent this procedure and others underwent sphincterotome biliary cannulation using contrast injection as the conventional method. Results. Patients in the two groups were comparable in terms of gender and age. Successful biliary cannulation was achieved similary in the guidewire and conventional group (89.2% versus 86.4%) that in 5.4% and 14.1% of them it was difficultly performed, respectively (P = 0.003). The main pancreatic duct was more visualized in 99.0% of patients in conventional group in comparison with 79.0% in another group (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that wire-guided cannulation had a protective role for post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (OR: 0.336, 95% CI: 0.181-0.623, P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in rates of other procedure-related complications, such as, pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation. Conclusion. The use of guidewire cannulation in comparison with conventional method can be accompanied with lower post-ERCP hyperamylasemia, and therefore selection of this cannulation technique especially in high-risk group is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11288,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","volume":"2012 ","pages":"821376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/821376","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/821376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background and Study Aims. The usefulness of wire-guided cannulation for avoiding hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is conflicting, and therefore we designed this study to determine whether wire-guided cannulation reduces the rate of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis and compare its efficacy to conventional method. Patients and Methods. Seven hundred and forty-eight patients with hepatobiliary diseases consecutively underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP at the unit of Taleghani referral hospital in Tehran. Among them, 546 patients were eligible for wire-guided cannulation and underwent this procedure and others underwent sphincterotome biliary cannulation using contrast injection as the conventional method. Results. Patients in the two groups were comparable in terms of gender and age. Successful biliary cannulation was achieved similary in the guidewire and conventional group (89.2% versus 86.4%) that in 5.4% and 14.1% of them it was difficultly performed, respectively (P = 0.003). The main pancreatic duct was more visualized in 99.0% of patients in conventional group in comparison with 79.0% in another group (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that wire-guided cannulation had a protective role for post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (OR: 0.336, 95% CI: 0.181-0.623, P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in rates of other procedure-related complications, such as, pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation. Conclusion. The use of guidewire cannulation in comparison with conventional method can be accompanied with lower post-ERCP hyperamylasemia, and therefore selection of this cannulation technique especially in high-risk group is recommended.

Abstract Image

内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术后钢丝引导插管对降低高淀粉酶血症和胰腺炎的预防作用。
背景和研究目的。在内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)后,钢丝引导插管对避免高淀淀酶血症和胰腺炎的有效性存在争议,因此我们设计了这项研究,以确定钢丝引导插管是否能降低ERCP后高淀淀酶血症和胰腺炎的发生率,并将其与传统方法的疗效进行比较。患者和方法。748名肝胆疾病患者在德黑兰Taleghani转诊医院连续接受了诊断性或治疗性ERCP治疗。其中546例符合条件的患者行了线导胆道插管,其余患者行常规方式的造影剂注射括约肌胆道插管。结果。两组患者在性别和年龄方面具有可比性。导丝组与常规组胆道插管成功率相似(89.2%比86.4%),难插管率分别为5.4%和14.1% (P = 0.003)。常规组的主胰管显像率为99.0%,而非常规组为79.0% (P < 0.001)。多因素回归分析显示,钢丝引导插管对ercp后高淀粉酶血症有保护作用(OR: 0.336, 95% CI: 0.181 ~ 0.623, P < 0.001)。然而,两组在其他手术相关并发症的发生率上没有显著差异,如胰腺炎、出血和穿孔。结论。与常规方法相比,使用导丝插管可降低ercp后高淀粉酶血症,因此建议高危人群特别选择导丝插管技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信