The complexity of narrative interferes in the use of conjunctions in children with specific language impairment.

Deborah Oliveira Gonzalez, Ana Manhani Cáceres, Ana Carolina Paiva Bento-Gaz, Debora Maria Befi-Lopes
{"title":"The complexity of narrative interferes in the use of conjunctions in children with specific language impairment.","authors":"Deborah Oliveira Gonzalez,&nbsp;Ana Manhani Cáceres,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Paiva Bento-Gaz,&nbsp;Debora Maria Befi-Lopes","doi":"10.1590/s2179-64912012000200011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify the use of conjunctions in narratives, and to investigate the influence of stimuli's complexity over the type of conjunctions used by children with specific language impairment (SLI) and children with typical language development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 40 children (20 with typical language development and 20 with SLI) with ages between 7 and 10 years, paired by age range. Fifteen stories with increasing of complexity were used to obtain the narratives; stories were classified into mechanical, behavioral and intentional, and each of them was represented by four scenes. Narratives were analyzed according to occurrence and classification of conjunctions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups used more coordinative than subordinate conjunctions, with significant decrease in the use of conjunctions in the discourse of SLI children. The use of conjunctions varied according to the type of narrative: for coordinative conjunctions, both groups differed only between intentional and behavioral narratives, with higher occurrence in behavioral ones; for subordinate conjunctions, typically developing children's performance did not show differences between narratives, while SLI children presented fewer occurrences in intentional narratives, which was different from other narratives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups used more coordinative than subordinate conjunctions; however, typically developing children presented more conjunctions than SLI children. The production of children with SLI was influenced by stimulus, since more complex narratives has less use of subordinate conjunctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":89403,"journal":{"name":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","volume":"24 2","pages":"152-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s2179-64912012000200011","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-64912012000200011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose: To verify the use of conjunctions in narratives, and to investigate the influence of stimuli's complexity over the type of conjunctions used by children with specific language impairment (SLI) and children with typical language development.

Methods: Participants were 40 children (20 with typical language development and 20 with SLI) with ages between 7 and 10 years, paired by age range. Fifteen stories with increasing of complexity were used to obtain the narratives; stories were classified into mechanical, behavioral and intentional, and each of them was represented by four scenes. Narratives were analyzed according to occurrence and classification of conjunctions.

Results: Both groups used more coordinative than subordinate conjunctions, with significant decrease in the use of conjunctions in the discourse of SLI children. The use of conjunctions varied according to the type of narrative: for coordinative conjunctions, both groups differed only between intentional and behavioral narratives, with higher occurrence in behavioral ones; for subordinate conjunctions, typically developing children's performance did not show differences between narratives, while SLI children presented fewer occurrences in intentional narratives, which was different from other narratives.

Conclusion: Both groups used more coordinative than subordinate conjunctions; however, typically developing children presented more conjunctions than SLI children. The production of children with SLI was influenced by stimulus, since more complex narratives has less use of subordinate conjunctions.

叙述的复杂性干扰了特殊语言障碍儿童连词的使用。
目的:验证连词在叙述中的使用,并探讨刺激复杂性对特殊语言障碍儿童和典型语言发育儿童连词使用类型的影响。方法:选取年龄在7 ~ 10岁的40名儿童(20名为典型语言发育儿童,20名为特殊语言障碍儿童),按年龄分组。通过15个复杂的故事来获得叙事;故事分为机械故事、行为故事和意向性故事,每一种故事都用四个场景来表现。根据连词的发生和分类对叙事进行分析。结果:两组儿童在语篇中使用协调连词的比例均高于从属连词,且两组儿童在语篇中使用连词的比例均显著降低。连词的使用随叙述类型的不同而不同:对于协调连词,两组只在意图叙述和行为叙述之间存在差异,行为叙述的使用频率更高;对于从属连词,正常发育儿童的表现在不同叙述中没有差异,而特殊语言障碍儿童在有意叙述中出现的次数较少,这与其他叙述不同。结论:两组使用的并列连词均多于从属连词;然而,正常发育的儿童比特殊语言障碍儿童表现出更多的连词。特殊语言障碍儿童的生产受到刺激的影响,因为更复杂的叙述较少使用从属连词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书