Central Venous Line Placement prior to Gastric Bypass Improves Operating Room Efficiency.

ISRN surgery Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-08 DOI:10.5402/2012/816871
D Wayne Overby, Geoffrey P Kohn, Karen J Colton, Joseph M Stavas, Robert G Dixon, Anthony Passannante, Timothy M Farrell
{"title":"Central Venous Line Placement prior to Gastric Bypass Improves Operating Room Efficiency.","authors":"D Wayne Overby,&nbsp;Geoffrey P Kohn,&nbsp;Karen J Colton,&nbsp;Joseph M Stavas,&nbsp;Robert G Dixon,&nbsp;Anthony Passannante,&nbsp;Timothy M Farrell","doi":"10.5402/2012/816871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Bariatric surgery has increased across America. Venous access is difficult in these patients. Anesthesiologists often utilize valuable operating room (OR) time acquiring reliable intravenous lines. Our objective was to determine if outpatient central venous line (CVL) placement improves OR efficiency and professional reimbursement for CVL insertion. Methods. In our bariatric practice, selected surgery patients have outpatient CVLs placed during prophylactic vena cava filter placement. In a cohort of 268 gastric bypass patients operated between 1/01 and 11/06, we compared time-to-incision between 106 with pre-established CVLs and 162 without. In addition, we determined professional compensation rates for CVLs placed outpatient versus CVLs inserted in the OR. Results. Patients with preoperative (outpatient) CVLs required 35.6 ± 12.5 minutes to skin incision compared with 42.5 ± 13.9 minutes for controls (P < 0.0001), and 34.9% had skin incision in <30 minutes compared with 16.4% of controls. Radiologists collected 28.2% of outpatient billings for CPT code 36556, compared with anesthesiologists who collected <1% when placing CVLs in the OR. Conclusions. Outpatient CVLs prior to gastric bypass improve efficiency in the OR with earlier skin incision. Professional reimbursement is better for outpatient CVLs than intraoperative inpatient CVLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":89400,"journal":{"name":"ISRN surgery","volume":"2012 ","pages":"816871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/816871","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/816871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Bariatric surgery has increased across America. Venous access is difficult in these patients. Anesthesiologists often utilize valuable operating room (OR) time acquiring reliable intravenous lines. Our objective was to determine if outpatient central venous line (CVL) placement improves OR efficiency and professional reimbursement for CVL insertion. Methods. In our bariatric practice, selected surgery patients have outpatient CVLs placed during prophylactic vena cava filter placement. In a cohort of 268 gastric bypass patients operated between 1/01 and 11/06, we compared time-to-incision between 106 with pre-established CVLs and 162 without. In addition, we determined professional compensation rates for CVLs placed outpatient versus CVLs inserted in the OR. Results. Patients with preoperative (outpatient) CVLs required 35.6 ± 12.5 minutes to skin incision compared with 42.5 ± 13.9 minutes for controls (P < 0.0001), and 34.9% had skin incision in <30 minutes compared with 16.4% of controls. Radiologists collected 28.2% of outpatient billings for CPT code 36556, compared with anesthesiologists who collected <1% when placing CVLs in the OR. Conclusions. Outpatient CVLs prior to gastric bypass improve efficiency in the OR with earlier skin incision. Professional reimbursement is better for outpatient CVLs than intraoperative inpatient CVLs.

Abstract Image

胃分流术前放置中心静脉管可提高手术室效率。
背景。减肥手术在美国各地都有所增加。在这些患者中静脉通路是困难的。麻醉师经常利用宝贵的手术室时间来获取可靠的静脉导管。我们的目的是确定门诊中心静脉线(CVL)放置是否提高了手术室的效率和CVL插入的专业报销。方法。在我们的减肥实践中,选择手术患者在预防性腔静脉过滤器放置期间放置门诊cvl。在1月1日至6月11日期间进行胃旁路手术的268例患者中,我们比较了106例预先建立cvl的患者和162例未建立cvl的患者的切口时间。此外,我们确定了门诊放置的cvl与在手术室插入的cvl的专业补偿率。结果。术前(门诊)cvl患者皮肤切开时间为35.6±12.5分钟,对照组为42.5±13.9分钟(P < 0.0001)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信