Patterns of referral in a Canadian primary care electronic health record database: retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Joshua Shadd, Bridget L Ryan, Heather Maddocks, Amardeep Thind
{"title":"Patterns of referral in a Canadian primary care electronic health record database: retrospective cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Joshua Shadd,&nbsp;Bridget L Ryan,&nbsp;Heather Maddocks,&nbsp;Amardeep Thind","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v19i4.816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Databases derived from primary care electronic health records (EHRs) are ideally suited to study clinical influences on referral patterns. This is the first study outside the United Kingdom to use an EHR database to describe rates of referral per patient from family physicians to specialists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use a primary care EHR database to describe referrals to specialist physicians; to partition variance in referral rates between the practice and patient levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of de-identified EHRs of 33 998 patients from 10 primary care practices in Ontario, Canada. The study cohort included all patients who visited their family physician 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 (n ≥ 24856). Specialist referrals for each patient were counted for 12 months following their index visit. Rates of referral were compared by sex, age, number of office visits, practice location and specialist type using t-tests or Pearson's correlation. Variance partitioning determined the proportion of variance in the overall referral rate accounted for by the practice and patient levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 7771 patients (31.3%) had one or more referrals. The overall referral rate was 455/1000 patients/year (95% CI, 444-465). Rates were higher for females, older patients and rural practices. The referral rate correlated with the number of family physician office visits. Ninety-two percent of the total variance in referral rates was attributable to the patient (vs. practice) level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A Canadian primary care EHR database showed similar patterns of referral to those reported from administrative databases. Most variance in referral rates is explained at the patient level.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"19 4","pages":"217-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i4.816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Databases derived from primary care electronic health records (EHRs) are ideally suited to study clinical influences on referral patterns. This is the first study outside the United Kingdom to use an EHR database to describe rates of referral per patient from family physicians to specialists.

Objective: To use a primary care EHR database to describe referrals to specialist physicians; to partition variance in referral rates between the practice and patient levels.

Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of de-identified EHRs of 33 998 patients from 10 primary care practices in Ontario, Canada. The study cohort included all patients who visited their family physician 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 (n ≥ 24856). Specialist referrals for each patient were counted for 12 months following their index visit. Rates of referral were compared by sex, age, number of office visits, practice location and specialist type using t-tests or Pearson's correlation. Variance partitioning determined the proportion of variance in the overall referral rate accounted for by the practice and patient levels.

Results: In total, 7771 patients (31.3%) had one or more referrals. The overall referral rate was 455/1000 patients/year (95% CI, 444-465). Rates were higher for females, older patients and rural practices. The referral rate correlated with the number of family physician office visits. Ninety-two percent of the total variance in referral rates was attributable to the patient (vs. practice) level.

Conclusions: A Canadian primary care EHR database showed similar patterns of referral to those reported from administrative databases. Most variance in referral rates is explained at the patient level.

加拿大初级保健电子健康记录数据库中的转诊模式:回顾性横断面分析。
背景:来自初级保健电子健康记录(EHRs)的数据库非常适合研究临床对转诊模式的影响。这是英国以外第一个使用电子病历数据库来描述每名患者从家庭医生转诊到专科医生的比率的研究。目的:使用初级保健电子病历数据库描述转诊到专科医生;划分转诊率在执业和患者水平之间的差异。方法:回顾性横断面分析来自加拿大安大略省10个初级保健诊所的33998名患者的去识别电子病历。研究队列包括2007年4月1日至2008年3月31日访问家庭医生的所有患者(n≥24856)。每位患者的专家转诊在其首次就诊后的12个月内进行计数。转诊率按性别、年龄、就诊次数、执业地点和专科类型进行比较,使用t检验或Pearson相关。方差划分确定了由实践和患者水平所占的总体转诊率中方差的比例。结果:共有7771例(31.3%)患者有一次或多次转诊。总体转诊率为455/1000患者/年(95% CI, 444-465)。女性、老年患者和农村患者的比例更高。转诊率与家庭医生就诊次数相关。转诊率总差异的92%可归因于患者(vs.执业)水平。结论:加拿大初级保健电子病历数据库显示了与来自行政数据库的报告相似的转诊模式。转诊率的大多数差异是在患者水平上解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信