Improving preterm ophthalmologic care in the era of accountable care organizations.

C Jason Wang, Alison A Little, Karen Kamholz, Jaime Bruce Holliman, Marissa D Wise, Jonathan Davis, Steven Ringer, Cynthia Cole, Deborah K Vanderveen, Stephen P Christiansen, Howard Bauchner
{"title":"Improving preterm ophthalmologic care in the era of accountable care organizations.","authors":"C Jason Wang,&nbsp;Alison A Little,&nbsp;Karen Kamholz,&nbsp;Jaime Bruce Holliman,&nbsp;Marissa D Wise,&nbsp;Jonathan Davis,&nbsp;Steven Ringer,&nbsp;Cynthia Cole,&nbsp;Deborah K Vanderveen,&nbsp;Stephen P Christiansen,&nbsp;Howard Bauchner","doi":"10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVES To understand retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) follow-up care for preterm very low-birth-weight infants (VLBW; &lt;1500 g) in the context of the chronic care model and identify opportunities for improvement under accountable care organizations. METHODS We conducted focus groups and interviews with parents (N = 47) of VLBW infants and interviews with neonatal intensive care unit and ophthalmologic providers (N = 28) at 6 sites in Massachusetts and South Carolina. Themes are reported according to consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines. RESULTS Respondents perceived that legal liability and low reimbursement contributed to shortages of ROP providers. Some neonatal intensive care units offered subsidies to attract ophthalmologic providers or delayed transfers to institutions that could not provide ROP examinations and/or treatment. Sites used variable practices for coordinating ROP care. Even at sites with a tracking database and a dedicated ROP coordinator, significant time was required to ensure that examinations and treatment occurred as scheduled. Parents' ability to manage their children's health care was limited by parental understanding of ROP, feeling overwhelmed by the infant's care, and unmet needs for resources to address social stressors. CONCLUSIONS Under accountable care organizations, hospitals and ophthalmology practices should share responsibility for ensuring coordinated ROP care to mitigate liability concerns. To promote integrated care, reimbursement for ROP care should be bundled to include screening, diagnosis, treatment, and appropriate follow-up. Clinical information systems should be enhanced to increase efficiency and limit lapses in care. Self-management tools and connections to community resources could help promote families' attendance of follow-up appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1890","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To understand retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) follow-up care for preterm very low-birth-weight infants (VLBW; <1500 g) in the context of the chronic care model and identify opportunities for improvement under accountable care organizations. METHODS We conducted focus groups and interviews with parents (N = 47) of VLBW infants and interviews with neonatal intensive care unit and ophthalmologic providers (N = 28) at 6 sites in Massachusetts and South Carolina. Themes are reported according to consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines. RESULTS Respondents perceived that legal liability and low reimbursement contributed to shortages of ROP providers. Some neonatal intensive care units offered subsidies to attract ophthalmologic providers or delayed transfers to institutions that could not provide ROP examinations and/or treatment. Sites used variable practices for coordinating ROP care. Even at sites with a tracking database and a dedicated ROP coordinator, significant time was required to ensure that examinations and treatment occurred as scheduled. Parents' ability to manage their children's health care was limited by parental understanding of ROP, feeling overwhelmed by the infant's care, and unmet needs for resources to address social stressors. CONCLUSIONS Under accountable care organizations, hospitals and ophthalmology practices should share responsibility for ensuring coordinated ROP care to mitigate liability concerns. To promote integrated care, reimbursement for ROP care should be bundled to include screening, diagnosis, treatment, and appropriate follow-up. Clinical information systems should be enhanced to increase efficiency and limit lapses in care. Self-management tools and connections to community resources could help promote families' attendance of follow-up appointments.

在责任医疗机构时代改善早产儿眼科护理。
目的了解极低出生体重儿(VLBW)早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)随访护理;<1500 g)在慢性护理模式的背景下,并确定在负责任的护理组织下改进的机会。方法我们在马萨诸塞州和南卡罗来纳州的6个地点对VLBW婴儿的父母(N = 47)和新生儿重症监护病房和眼科提供者(N = 28)进行了焦点小组和访谈。根据报告定性研究指南的综合标准报告主题。结果受访者认为法律责任和低报销是导致ROP提供者短缺的原因。一些新生儿重症监护病房提供补贴,以吸引眼科医生或延迟转移到无法提供ROP检查和/或治疗的机构。站点使用不同的实践来协调ROP护理。即使在有跟踪数据库和专门ROP协调员的现场,也需要大量时间来确保检查和处理如期进行。由于父母对ROP的理解、对婴儿的照顾感到不堪重负以及对解决社会压力源的资源需求未得到满足,父母管理子女保健的能力受到限制。结论:在负责任的医疗机构下,医院和眼科实践应共同承担责任,确保协调的ROP护理,以减轻责任问题。为促进综合护理,ROP护理的报销应捆绑在一起,包括筛查、诊断、治疗和适当的随访。应加强临床信息系统,以提高效率和限制护理失误。自我管理工具和与社区资源的联系有助于促进家庭参加后续预约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of ophthalmology
Archives of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信