Altered amygdala activation during face processing in Iraqi and Afghanistani war veterans.

Alan N Simmons, Scott C Matthews, Irina A Strigo, Dewleen G Baker, Heather K Donovan, Arame Motezadi, Murray B Stein, Martin P Paulus
{"title":"Altered amygdala activation during face processing in Iraqi and Afghanistani war veterans.","authors":"Alan N Simmons,&nbsp;Scott C Matthews,&nbsp;Irina A Strigo,&nbsp;Dewleen G Baker,&nbsp;Heather K Donovan,&nbsp;Arame Motezadi,&nbsp;Murray B Stein,&nbsp;Martin P Paulus","doi":"10.1186/2045-5380-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to combat can have a significant impact across a wide array of domains, and may manifest as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a debilitating mental illness that is associated with neural and affective sequelae. This study tested the hypothesis that combat-exposed individuals with and without PTSD, relative to healthy control subjects with no history of PTSD or combat exposure, would show amygdala hyperactivity during performance of a well-validated face processing task. We further hypothesized that differences in the prefrontal cortex would best differentiate the combat-exposed groups with and without PTSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve men with PTSD related to combat in Operations Enduring Freedom and/or Iraqi Freedom, 12 male combat-exposed control patients with a history of Operations Enduring Freedom and/or Iraqi Freedom combat exposure but no history of PTSD, and 12 healthy control male patients with no history of combat exposure or PTSD completed a face-matching task during functional magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PTSD group showed greater amygdala activation to fearful versus happy faces than both the combat-exposed control and healthy control groups. Both the PTSD and the combat-exposed control groups showed greater amygdala activation to all faces versus shapes relative to the healthy control group. However, the combat-exposed control group relative to the PTSD group showed greater prefrontal/parietal connectivity with the amygdala, while the PTSD group showed greater connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. The strength of connectivity in the PTSD group was inversely related to avoidance scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that PTSD is associated with a deficiency in top-down modulation of amygdala activation by the prefrontal cortex and shows specific sensitivity to fearful faces.</p>","PeriodicalId":89532,"journal":{"name":"Biology of mood & anxiety disorders","volume":"1 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2045-5380-1-6","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of mood & anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-5380-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Background: Exposure to combat can have a significant impact across a wide array of domains, and may manifest as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a debilitating mental illness that is associated with neural and affective sequelae. This study tested the hypothesis that combat-exposed individuals with and without PTSD, relative to healthy control subjects with no history of PTSD or combat exposure, would show amygdala hyperactivity during performance of a well-validated face processing task. We further hypothesized that differences in the prefrontal cortex would best differentiate the combat-exposed groups with and without PTSD.

Methods: Twelve men with PTSD related to combat in Operations Enduring Freedom and/or Iraqi Freedom, 12 male combat-exposed control patients with a history of Operations Enduring Freedom and/or Iraqi Freedom combat exposure but no history of PTSD, and 12 healthy control male patients with no history of combat exposure or PTSD completed a face-matching task during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: The PTSD group showed greater amygdala activation to fearful versus happy faces than both the combat-exposed control and healthy control groups. Both the PTSD and the combat-exposed control groups showed greater amygdala activation to all faces versus shapes relative to the healthy control group. However, the combat-exposed control group relative to the PTSD group showed greater prefrontal/parietal connectivity with the amygdala, while the PTSD group showed greater connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. The strength of connectivity in the PTSD group was inversely related to avoidance scores.

Conclusions: These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that PTSD is associated with a deficiency in top-down modulation of amygdala activation by the prefrontal cortex and shows specific sensitivity to fearful faces.

Abstract Image

伊拉克和阿富汗战争老兵面部处理过程中杏仁核激活的改变。
背景:暴露在战斗中会对许多领域产生重大影响,并可能表现为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),这是一种与神经和情感后遗症相关的使人衰弱的精神疾病。这项研究验证了这样一个假设:与没有创伤后应激障碍或战斗暴露史的健康对照者相比,有或没有创伤后应激障碍的战斗暴露者在执行一项经过充分验证的面部处理任务时,会表现出杏仁核过度活跃。我们进一步假设,前额叶皮层的差异将最好地区分有和没有创伤后应激障碍的战斗暴露组。方法:12名在“持久自由行动”和(或)“伊拉克自由行动”中与战斗有关的PTSD患者,12名有“持久自由行动”和(或)“伊拉克自由行动”战斗暴露史但无PTSD病史的男性战斗暴露对照患者,以及12名没有战斗暴露史或PTSD的健康对照男性患者,在功能磁共振成像期间完成面部匹配任务。结果:创伤后应激障碍组对恐惧和快乐面孔的杏仁核激活比暴露在战斗中的对照组和健康对照组都要大。与健康对照组相比,创伤后应激障碍和战斗暴露的对照组在所有面孔和形状上都显示出更大的杏仁核激活。然而,与创伤后应激障碍组相比,暴露于战斗中的对照组与杏仁核的前额叶/顶叶连通性更强,而创伤后应激障碍组与亚属扣带的连通性更强。PTSD组的连通性强度与回避得分呈负相关。结论:这些观察结果与PTSD与前额皮质自上而下的杏仁核激活调节缺陷有关,并表现出对恐惧面孔的特殊敏感性的假设是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书