Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data.

Vivienne J Zhu, Anne Belsito, Wanzhu Tu, J Marc Overhage
{"title":"Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data.","authors":"Vivienne J Zhu,&nbsp;Anne Belsito,&nbsp;Wanzhu Tu,&nbsp;J Marc Overhage","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-12-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational data are increasingly being used for pharmacoepidemiological, health services and clinical effectiveness research. Since pharmacies first introduced low-cost prescription programs (LCPP), researchers have worried that data about the medications provided through these programs might not be available in observational data derived from administrative sources, such as payer claims or pharmacy benefit management (PBM) company transactions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data from the Indiana Network for Patient Care to estimate the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes to whom an oral hypoglycemic agent was dispensed. Based on these estimates, we compared the proportions of patients who received medications from chains that do and do not offer an LCPP, the proportion trend over time based on claims data from a single payer, and to proportions estimated from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who received oral hypoglycemic medications did not vary based on whether the chain that dispensed the drug offered an LCPP or over time. Additionally, the rates were comparable to those estimated from MEPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Researchers can be reassured that data for medications available through LCPPs continue to be available through administrative data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"12 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-12-12","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-12-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Observational data are increasingly being used for pharmacoepidemiological, health services and clinical effectiveness research. Since pharmacies first introduced low-cost prescription programs (LCPP), researchers have worried that data about the medications provided through these programs might not be available in observational data derived from administrative sources, such as payer claims or pharmacy benefit management (PBM) company transactions.

Method: We used data from the Indiana Network for Patient Care to estimate the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes to whom an oral hypoglycemic agent was dispensed. Based on these estimates, we compared the proportions of patients who received medications from chains that do and do not offer an LCPP, the proportion trend over time based on claims data from a single payer, and to proportions estimated from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Results: We found that the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who received oral hypoglycemic medications did not vary based on whether the chain that dispensed the drug offered an LCPP or over time. Additionally, the rates were comparable to those estimated from MEPS.

Conclusion: Researchers can be reassured that data for medications available through LCPPs continue to be available through administrative data sources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过低成本处方药项目获得的药物数据可以通过药房福利管理和索赔数据获得。
背景:观察性数据越来越多地用于药物流行病学、卫生服务和临床有效性研究。自从药店首次引入低成本处方计划(LCPP)以来,研究人员一直担心,通过这些计划提供的药物数据可能无法从行政来源(如付款人索赔或药房福利管理(PBM)公司交易)中获得观察性数据。方法:我们使用来自印第安纳州患者护理网络的数据来估计2型糖尿病患者使用口服降糖药的比例。基于这些估计,我们比较了从提供和不提供LCPP的连锁店接受药物治疗的患者的比例,基于单一付款人索赔数据的比例随时间的趋势,以及从医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)估计的比例。结果:我们发现,接受口服降糖药治疗的2型糖尿病患者的比例并没有因配药链是否提供LCPP或随时间的变化而变化。此外,这些比率与MEPS估计的比率相当。结论:研究人员可以放心,通过LCPPs获得的药物数据将继续通过管理数据源获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信