['No naturally shaped human foot would end in wedged-in, pointed toes" (Knud Ahlborn)--Wandervögel, youth movement and movement for rational footwear].

Nike Ulrike Breyer
{"title":"['No naturally shaped human foot would end in wedged-in, pointed toes\" (Knud Ahlborn)--Wandervögel, youth movement and movement for rational footwear].","authors":"Nike Ulrike Breyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nineteenth century \"movement for rational clothing\" not only aimed at reforming women's clothes (leaving behind corset-fashion), it set out to improve women's rights in general. Few people know that footwear also was modernized in the second half of the nineteenth century. After shoes had been made for 350 years on the basis of a symmetry pattern, without or with almost invisible distinction between left and right feet, scientists around the Frankfurt born professor of anatomy Georg Hermann von Meyer (1815-1892) demanded with him radical reform of footwear--for both sexes--using new lasts that were modelled on the natural shape of feet. Around the turn of the century, after physicians, shoemakers and hygienists had spent decades debating new ideas, members of the Wandervogel movement adopted the issue for their own purposes and chose anatomic over fashionable yet unhealthy fits which tended to be pointed, slim and--above all--symmetrical. Once the Wandervogel movement had split into several smaller groupings in 1904 and become part of the Jugendbewegung (youth movement), some of its members wanted clothing to also carry symbolic meaning. Naturally-shaped hygienic boots should no longer just allow for walking without damage to the feet: they should become the embodiment of a new spirit and, beyond that, of a reformed society. A new \"lay practice\" and \"do-it-yourself\"-shoemaking replaced former academic programs for new natural footwear. Interestingly enough, alongside those quite radical concepts, a kind of \"footwear reform light\" established itself in the market: on the surface only slightly different from the old-fashioned, symmetrical shoes, these \"modern\" pairs, which consisted of a right and left shoe, remained successful even after the world wars and became the new standard in the twentieth century, because the shoes made according to this pattern lasted longer, fitted better and were more comfortable.</p>","PeriodicalId":81975,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"30 ","pages":"85-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nineteenth century "movement for rational clothing" not only aimed at reforming women's clothes (leaving behind corset-fashion), it set out to improve women's rights in general. Few people know that footwear also was modernized in the second half of the nineteenth century. After shoes had been made for 350 years on the basis of a symmetry pattern, without or with almost invisible distinction between left and right feet, scientists around the Frankfurt born professor of anatomy Georg Hermann von Meyer (1815-1892) demanded with him radical reform of footwear--for both sexes--using new lasts that were modelled on the natural shape of feet. Around the turn of the century, after physicians, shoemakers and hygienists had spent decades debating new ideas, members of the Wandervogel movement adopted the issue for their own purposes and chose anatomic over fashionable yet unhealthy fits which tended to be pointed, slim and--above all--symmetrical. Once the Wandervogel movement had split into several smaller groupings in 1904 and become part of the Jugendbewegung (youth movement), some of its members wanted clothing to also carry symbolic meaning. Naturally-shaped hygienic boots should no longer just allow for walking without damage to the feet: they should become the embodiment of a new spirit and, beyond that, of a reformed society. A new "lay practice" and "do-it-yourself"-shoemaking replaced former academic programs for new natural footwear. Interestingly enough, alongside those quite radical concepts, a kind of "footwear reform light" established itself in the market: on the surface only slightly different from the old-fashioned, symmetrical shoes, these "modern" pairs, which consisted of a right and left shoe, remained successful even after the world wars and became the new standard in the twentieth century, because the shoes made according to this pattern lasted longer, fitted better and were more comfortable.

[“没有自然形状的人脚最终会楔入,尖尖的脚趾”(Knud Ahlborn)—Wandervögel,青年运动和理性鞋类运动]。
19世纪的“理性服装运动”不仅旨在改革妇女的服装(抛弃紧身胸衣时尚),而且还着手改善妇女的总体权利。很少有人知道鞋类在19世纪下半叶也实现了现代化。350年来,鞋子都是在对称的基础上制作的,左右脚之间没有或几乎看不见的区别。法兰克福出生的解剖学教授乔治·赫尔曼·冯·迈耶(1815-1892)周围的科学家们要求他对男女鞋类进行彻底的改革,使用以脚的自然形状为模型的新鞋楦。大约在世纪之交,在医生、鞋匠和卫生学家花了几十年的时间讨论新的观点之后,“流浪汉运动”的成员们为了自己的目的而采纳了这个问题,他们选择了解剖学上的,而不是时尚但不健康的合身,后者往往是尖的、苗条的,最重要的是——对称的。1904年,流浪者运动分裂成几个较小的团体,并成为青年运动的一部分,其中一些成员希望服装也能承载象征意义。自然形状的卫生靴不应该再仅仅是为了走路而不伤脚:它们应该成为一种新精神的化身,除此之外,还应该成为一个改革后的社会的化身。一种新的“外行实践”和“自己动手”制鞋取代了以前的新天然鞋类的学术课程。有趣的是,除了这些相当激进的概念之外,一种“鞋类改革之光”在市场上确立了自己的地位:从表面上看,这些“现代”鞋与老式的对称鞋只有轻微的不同,这些“现代”鞋由左右双鞋组成,即使在世界大战后仍然很成功,并成为20世纪的新标准,因为根据这种模式制作的鞋子更耐用,更合脚,更舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信