Inappropriate Use of Gastric Acid Suppression Therapy in Hospitalized Patients with Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analysis.

ISRN gastroenterology Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-31 DOI:10.5402/2012/902320
Sadat Rashid, Dhyan Rajan, Javed Iqbal, Seth Lipka, Robin Jacob, Valeria Zilberman, Mitanshu Shah, Paul Mustacchia
{"title":"Inappropriate Use of Gastric Acid Suppression Therapy in Hospitalized Patients with Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Sadat Rashid,&nbsp;Dhyan Rajan,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal,&nbsp;Seth Lipka,&nbsp;Robin Jacob,&nbsp;Valeria Zilberman,&nbsp;Mitanshu Shah,&nbsp;Paul Mustacchia","doi":"10.5402/2012/902320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. The incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has steadily increased over the past decade. A multitude of factors for this rise in incidence of CDAD have been postulated, including the increased use of gastric acid suppression therapy (GAST). Despite the presence of practice guidelines for use of GAST, studies have demonstrated widespread inappropriate use of GAST in hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of inpatients with CDAD, with special emphasis placed on determining the appropriateness of GAST. Methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted at a multidisciplinary teaching hospital on inpatients with CDAD over a 10-year period. We assessed the use of GAST in the cases of CDAD. Data collection focused on the appropriate administration of GAST as defined by standard practice guidelines. Results. An inappropriate indication for GAST was not apparent in a majority (69.4%) of patients with CDAD. The inappropriate use of GAST was more prevalent in medical (86.1%) than on surgical services (13.9%) (P < 0.001). There were more cases (67.6%) of inappropriate use of GAST in noncritical care than in critical care areas (37.4%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Our study found that an inappropriate use of inpatient GAST in patients with CDAD was nearly 70 percent. Reduction of inappropriate use of GAST may be an additional approach to reduce the risk of CDAD and significantly decrease patient morbidity and healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":89397,"journal":{"name":"ISRN gastroenterology","volume":"2012 ","pages":"902320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/902320","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/902320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose. The incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has steadily increased over the past decade. A multitude of factors for this rise in incidence of CDAD have been postulated, including the increased use of gastric acid suppression therapy (GAST). Despite the presence of practice guidelines for use of GAST, studies have demonstrated widespread inappropriate use of GAST in hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of inpatients with CDAD, with special emphasis placed on determining the appropriateness of GAST. Methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted at a multidisciplinary teaching hospital on inpatients with CDAD over a 10-year period. We assessed the use of GAST in the cases of CDAD. Data collection focused on the appropriate administration of GAST as defined by standard practice guidelines. Results. An inappropriate indication for GAST was not apparent in a majority (69.4%) of patients with CDAD. The inappropriate use of GAST was more prevalent in medical (86.1%) than on surgical services (13.9%) (P < 0.001). There were more cases (67.6%) of inappropriate use of GAST in noncritical care than in critical care areas (37.4%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Our study found that an inappropriate use of inpatient GAST in patients with CDAD was nearly 70 percent. Reduction of inappropriate use of GAST may be an additional approach to reduce the risk of CDAD and significantly decrease patient morbidity and healthcare costs.

Abstract Image

难辨梭菌相关性腹泻住院患者不恰当使用胃酸抑制疗法:十年回顾性分析
目的。艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)的发病率在过去十年中稳步上升。导致CDAD发病率上升的因素有很多,包括胃酸抑制疗法(GAST)的使用增加。尽管存在GAST使用的实践指南,但研究表明住院患者中广泛存在不适当使用GAST的情况。我们对CDAD住院患者进行了回顾性分析,特别强调确定GAST的适宜性。方法。回顾性分析了一家多学科教学医院10年来CDAD住院患者的情况。我们评估了GAST在CDAD病例中的应用。数据收集的重点是标准实践指南所定义的GAST的适当管理。结果。在大多数(69.4%)CDAD患者中,GAST的适应症不明显。GAST的不当使用在内科(86.1%)比外科(13.9%)更为普遍(P < 0.001)。非重症监护区不恰当使用GAST的病例(67.6%)多于重症监护区(37.4%)(P < 0.001)。结论。我们的研究发现,住院CDAD患者不适当使用GAST的比例接近70%。减少不适当使用GAST可能是降低CDAD风险和显著降低患者发病率和医疗费用的另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信