Diagnosis of B-cell non-hodgkin lymphomas with small-/intermediate-sized cells in cytopathology.

Pathology research international Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-27 DOI:10.1155/2012/164934
Joerg Schwock, William R Geddie
{"title":"Diagnosis of B-cell non-hodgkin lymphomas with small-/intermediate-sized cells in cytopathology.","authors":"Joerg Schwock,&nbsp;William R Geddie","doi":"10.1155/2012/164934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fine needle sampling is a fast, safe, and potentially cost-effective method of obtaining tissue for cytomorphologic assessment aimed at both initial triage and, in some cases, complete diagnosis of patients that present clinically with lymphadenopathy. The cytologic diagnosis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas composed of small-/intermediate-sized cells, however, has been seen as an area of great difficulty even for experienced observers due to the morphologic overlap between lymphoma and reactive lymphadenopathies as well as between the lymphoma entities themselves. Although ancillary testing has improved diagnostic accuracy, the results from these tests must be interpreted within the morphological and clinical context to avoid misinterpretation. Importantly, the recognition of specific cytologic features is crucial in guiding the appropriate selection of ancillary tests which will either confirm or refute a tentative diagnosis. For these reasons, we here review the cytologic characteristics particular to five common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas which typically cause the most diagnostic confusion based on cytological assessment alone: marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. We summarize the most pertinent cytomorphologic features for each entity as well as for reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, contrast them with each other to facilitate their recognition, and highlight common diagnostic pitfalls.</p>","PeriodicalId":89212,"journal":{"name":"Pathology research international","volume":"2012 ","pages":"164934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/164934","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology research international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/164934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Fine needle sampling is a fast, safe, and potentially cost-effective method of obtaining tissue for cytomorphologic assessment aimed at both initial triage and, in some cases, complete diagnosis of patients that present clinically with lymphadenopathy. The cytologic diagnosis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas composed of small-/intermediate-sized cells, however, has been seen as an area of great difficulty even for experienced observers due to the morphologic overlap between lymphoma and reactive lymphadenopathies as well as between the lymphoma entities themselves. Although ancillary testing has improved diagnostic accuracy, the results from these tests must be interpreted within the morphological and clinical context to avoid misinterpretation. Importantly, the recognition of specific cytologic features is crucial in guiding the appropriate selection of ancillary tests which will either confirm or refute a tentative diagnosis. For these reasons, we here review the cytologic characteristics particular to five common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas which typically cause the most diagnostic confusion based on cytological assessment alone: marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. We summarize the most pertinent cytomorphologic features for each entity as well as for reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, contrast them with each other to facilitate their recognition, and highlight common diagnostic pitfalls.

小/中细胞b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的病理诊断。
细针取样是一种快速、安全且具有潜在成本效益的方法,用于获取组织进行细胞形态学评估,既可用于初始分诊,也可在某些情况下用于临床表现为淋巴结病的患者的完整诊断。然而,由于淋巴瘤和反应性淋巴结病之间以及淋巴瘤实体本身之间的形态学重叠,即使对于经验丰富的观察者来说,由小/中等大小细胞组成的b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的细胞学诊断也被认为是一个非常困难的领域。虽然辅助测试提高了诊断的准确性,但这些测试的结果必须在形态学和临床背景下进行解释,以避免误解。重要的是,识别特定的细胞学特征对于指导适当选择辅助测试至关重要,这些测试将证实或反驳初步诊断。基于这些原因,我们在这里回顾了五种常见的b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的细胞学特征,这些淋巴瘤通常会引起基于细胞学评估的诊断混乱:边缘带淋巴瘤、滤泡性淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤、慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤和淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤。我们总结了每个实体以及反应性淋巴样增生最相关的细胞形态学特征,将它们相互比较以促进识别,并强调常见的诊断缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信