Diversity in the biomedical research workforce: developing talent.

Richard McGee, Suman Saran, Terry A Krulwich
{"title":"Diversity in the biomedical research workforce: developing talent.","authors":"Richard McGee,&nbsp;Suman Saran,&nbsp;Terry A Krulwich","doi":"10.1002/msj.21310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much has been written about the need for and barriers to achievement of greater diversity in the biomedical workforce from the perspectives of gender, race, and ethnicity; this is not a new topic. These discussions often center around a \"pipeline\" metaphor that imagines students flowing through a series of experiences to eventually arrive at a science career. Here we argue that diversity will only be achieved if the primary focus is on (1) what is happening within the pipeline, not just counting individuals entering and leaving it; (2) de-emphasizing the achievement of academic milestones by typical ages; and (3) adopting approaches that most effectively develop talent. Students may develop skills at different rates based on factors such as earlier access to educational resources, exposure to science (especially research experiences), and competing demands for time and attention during high school and college. Therefore, there is wide variety among students at any point along the pipeline. Taking this view requires letting go of imagining the pipeline as a sequence of age-dependent steps in favor of milestones of skill and talent development decoupled from age or educational stage. Emphasizing talent development opens up many new approaches for science training outside of traditional degree programs. This article provides examples of such approaches, including interventions at the postbaccalaureate and PhD levels, as well as a novel coaching model that incorporates well-established social science theories and complements traditional mentoring. These approaches could significantly impact diversity by developing scientific talent, especially among currently underrepresented minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51137,"journal":{"name":"Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine","volume":"79 3","pages":"397-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/msj.21310","citationCount":"103","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

Abstract

Much has been written about the need for and barriers to achievement of greater diversity in the biomedical workforce from the perspectives of gender, race, and ethnicity; this is not a new topic. These discussions often center around a "pipeline" metaphor that imagines students flowing through a series of experiences to eventually arrive at a science career. Here we argue that diversity will only be achieved if the primary focus is on (1) what is happening within the pipeline, not just counting individuals entering and leaving it; (2) de-emphasizing the achievement of academic milestones by typical ages; and (3) adopting approaches that most effectively develop talent. Students may develop skills at different rates based on factors such as earlier access to educational resources, exposure to science (especially research experiences), and competing demands for time and attention during high school and college. Therefore, there is wide variety among students at any point along the pipeline. Taking this view requires letting go of imagining the pipeline as a sequence of age-dependent steps in favor of milestones of skill and talent development decoupled from age or educational stage. Emphasizing talent development opens up many new approaches for science training outside of traditional degree programs. This article provides examples of such approaches, including interventions at the postbaccalaureate and PhD levels, as well as a novel coaching model that incorporates well-established social science theories and complements traditional mentoring. These approaches could significantly impact diversity by developing scientific talent, especially among currently underrepresented minorities.

生物医学研究人员的多样性:培养人才。
从性别、种族和族裔的角度,已经写了很多关于生物医学工作人员实现更大多样性的必要性和障碍的文章;这不是一个新话题。这些讨论通常围绕着一个“管道”的比喻,想象学生通过一系列的经历最终到达科学事业。在这里,我们认为,只有将主要重点放在(1)管道内发生的事情,而不仅仅是计算进入和离开管道的个人,才能实现多样性;(2)不再以典型年龄来强调学业里程碑的成就;(3)采用最有效的人才培养方法。学生可能会以不同的速度发展技能,这取决于诸如早期获得教育资源、接触科学(尤其是研究经验)以及高中和大学期间对时间和注意力的竞争需求等因素。因此,在管道的任何一点上,学生之间都有很大的差异。要接受这一观点,就需要放弃将人才培养管道想象成一系列与年龄相关的步骤,转而考虑与年龄或教育阶段脱钩的技能和才能发展的里程碑。强调人才培养为传统学位课程之外的科学培训开辟了许多新的途径。本文提供了这些方法的例子,包括在本科后和博士阶段的干预,以及一种结合了成熟的社会科学理论并补充了传统指导的新型指导模式。这些方法可以通过培养科学人才,特别是在目前代表性不足的少数民族中,显著影响多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信