Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Pure DCIS: Is It Necessary?

ISRN surgery Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-14 DOI:10.5402/2012/394095
D E Boler, N Cabioglu, U Ince, G Esen, C Uras
{"title":"Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Pure DCIS: Is It Necessary?","authors":"D E Boler, N Cabioglu, U Ince, G Esen, C Uras","doi":"10.5402/2012/394095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been a matter of debate due to very low rate of axillary metastases. We therefore aimed to identify factors in a single institutional series to select patients who may benefit from SLNB. Material and Methods. Patients, diagnosed with pure DCIS (n = 63) between July 2000 and March 2011, were reviewed. All the sentinel lymph nodes were examined by serial sectioning (50 μm) of the entire lymph node and H&E staining, and by cytokeratin immunostaining in suspicious cases. Results. Median age was 51 (range, 30–79). Of 63 patients, 40 cases (63.5%) with pure DCIS underwent SLN, and 2 of them had a positive SLN (5%). In both 2 cases with SLN metastases, only one sentinel lymph node was involved with tumor cells. Patients who underwent SLNB were more likely to have a tumor size >30 mm or DCIS with intermediate and high nuclear grade or a mastectomy in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion. In our series, we found a slightly higher rate of SLNB positivity in patients with pure DCIS than the large series reported elsewhere. This may either be due to the meticulous examination of SLNs by serial sectioning technique or due to our patient selection criteria or both.","PeriodicalId":89400,"journal":{"name":"ISRN surgery","volume":"2012 ","pages":"394095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/394095","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/394095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Introduction. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been a matter of debate due to very low rate of axillary metastases. We therefore aimed to identify factors in a single institutional series to select patients who may benefit from SLNB. Material and Methods. Patients, diagnosed with pure DCIS (n = 63) between July 2000 and March 2011, were reviewed. All the sentinel lymph nodes were examined by serial sectioning (50 μm) of the entire lymph node and H&E staining, and by cytokeratin immunostaining in suspicious cases. Results. Median age was 51 (range, 30–79). Of 63 patients, 40 cases (63.5%) with pure DCIS underwent SLN, and 2 of them had a positive SLN (5%). In both 2 cases with SLN metastases, only one sentinel lymph node was involved with tumor cells. Patients who underwent SLNB were more likely to have a tumor size >30 mm or DCIS with intermediate and high nuclear grade or a mastectomy in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion. In our series, we found a slightly higher rate of SLNB positivity in patients with pure DCIS than the large series reported elsewhere. This may either be due to the meticulous examination of SLNs by serial sectioning technique or due to our patient selection criteria or both.
单纯DCIS前哨淋巴结活检是否必要?
介绍。单纯导管原位癌(DCIS)患者的前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)一直存在争议,因为腋窝转移率非常低。因此,我们的目的是在单一机构系列中确定因素,以选择可能受益于SLNB的患者。材料和方法。对2000年7月至2011年3月诊断为单纯DCIS的患者(n = 63)进行了回顾性研究。所有前哨淋巴结均行全淋巴结50 μm连续切片及H&E染色,可疑病例行细胞角蛋白免疫染色。结果。中位年龄51岁(范围30-79岁)。63例单纯DCIS患者中,40例(63.5%)行SLN,其中2例(5%)SLN阳性。在2例SLN转移病例中,只有一个前哨淋巴结被肿瘤细胞累及。在单因素和多因素分析中,接受SLNB的患者更有可能患有肿瘤大小>30 mm或DCIS伴中高核级或乳房切除术。结论。在我们的系列研究中,我们发现单纯DCIS患者的SLNB阳性率略高于其他大系列报道。这可能是由于连续切片技术对sln的细致检查,也可能是由于我们的患者选择标准,或者两者兼而有之。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信