Review of Ambulatory Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in the Management of Advanced Heart Failure

Sharayne Mark MD, Pedro Calderon-Artero MD, Lisa Kakinami PhD, Jeffrey Alexis MD, Leway Chen MD, MPH, Eugene Storozynsky MD, PhD, Michael W. Fong MD
{"title":"Review of Ambulatory Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in the Management of Advanced Heart Failure","authors":"Sharayne Mark MD,&nbsp;Pedro Calderon-Artero MD,&nbsp;Lisa Kakinami PhD,&nbsp;Jeffrey Alexis MD,&nbsp;Leway Chen MD, MPH,&nbsp;Eugene Storozynsky MD, PhD,&nbsp;Michael W. Fong MD","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00268.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has declined secondary to associated complications and lack of demonstrable efficacy in the inpatient setting. Few studies have been published on the use of PAC in nonacute heart failure (HF) patients. The purpose of this study was to review the use of PAC in guiding advanced therapy in nonacute ambulatory HF patients. A retrospective observational study assessing our group’s practice pattern with regard to the use of PAC in 515 ambulatory HF patients, outcomes, and adverse events that resulted from its use was performed. A total of 159 ambulatory HF patients were referred for PAC; 7% underwent heart transplant, 6% had ventricular assist device (VAD) placement, 18% underwent inotropic therapy, and 48% had addition of therapy while 14% had subtraction of therapy. Adverse events occurred in 4% of ambulatory PAC. Patients who underwent heart transplant, VAD, or inotropic therapy had significantly elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, mean pulmonary artery pressures, and depressed cardiac index. Patients selected for inotropic therapy also had significantly elevated right atrial pressures and depressed ejection fractions. PAC use safely guided medical therapy in more than half of the nonacute ambulatory patients. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":83668,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","volume":"18 3","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00268.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00268.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has declined secondary to associated complications and lack of demonstrable efficacy in the inpatient setting. Few studies have been published on the use of PAC in nonacute heart failure (HF) patients. The purpose of this study was to review the use of PAC in guiding advanced therapy in nonacute ambulatory HF patients. A retrospective observational study assessing our group’s practice pattern with regard to the use of PAC in 515 ambulatory HF patients, outcomes, and adverse events that resulted from its use was performed. A total of 159 ambulatory HF patients were referred for PAC; 7% underwent heart transplant, 6% had ventricular assist device (VAD) placement, 18% underwent inotropic therapy, and 48% had addition of therapy while 14% had subtraction of therapy. Adverse events occurred in 4% of ambulatory PAC. Patients who underwent heart transplant, VAD, or inotropic therapy had significantly elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, mean pulmonary artery pressures, and depressed cardiac index. Patients selected for inotropic therapy also had significantly elevated right atrial pressures and depressed ejection fractions. PAC use safely guided medical therapy in more than half of the nonacute ambulatory patients. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Image

动态肺动脉导管置入术治疗晚期心力衰竭的研究进展
肺动脉导管(PAC)的使用由于相关并发症和在住院环境中缺乏明显的疗效而下降。关于在非急性心力衰竭(HF)患者中使用PAC的研究很少发表。本研究的目的是回顾PAC在指导非急性非动态心衰患者的晚期治疗中的应用。我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,评估了我们组在515例流动心衰患者中使用PAC的实践模式、结果和使用PAC导致的不良事件。共有159例非卧床HF患者接受PAC治疗;7%的人接受了心脏移植,6%的人接受了心室辅助装置(VAD)的放置,18%的人接受了肌力治疗,48%的人接受了增加治疗,14%的人接受了减少治疗。4%的动态PAC患者发生不良事件。接受心脏移植、VAD或肌力治疗的患者肺毛细血管楔压、平均肺动脉压显著升高,心脏指数下降。选择肌力治疗的患者右心房压明显升高,射血分数明显降低。半数以上的非急性门诊患者采用安全指导的药物治疗。©2011 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书