[Yesterday, today, tomorrow. A retrospective look at the acid rain problem].

Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2008-01-01
Ed Buijsman
{"title":"[Yesterday, today, tomorrow. A retrospective look at the acid rain problem].","authors":"Ed Buijsman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Last century, at the end of the seventies, Europe was startled by a serious environmental problem: acid rain. Acid rain was held responsible for the decline of fishes in Scandinavian lakes. Later, it was suggested that acid rain could lead to forest dieback over vast areas of Europe. Forests in the Netherlands could be at great risk, as well. It was clear to everyone what it was all about, for 'rain' means water falling from the atmosphere and the meaning of 'acid' was evident, too. Acid rain caused much commotion in the eighties but, since then, it has faded into the background. Why is it, that there is so little attention paid to acid rain these days? Maybe the acid rain problem was a hype; with an exaggerated reaction to a problem that was, in fact, insignificant. This article aims to reconstruct the history of one of the most prominent environmental problems of the twentieth century. The article describes the origin of the acid rain problem in the 1960s and describes the scientific research that was carried out to develop a better understanding of the problem from an atmospheric chemical point of view. Subsequently, it treats the rise of public awareness in the seventies. The article subsequently focuses on the situation in the Netherlands. The initial research into forest health showed alarming results. This led to widespread concern within The Netherlands, which, once more, urged the government to come into action. Some measures to reduce air-polluting emissions were already taken in the early 1980s. However, these were meant, mainly, to improve local air quality. As the eighties progressed, acid rain provided an additional argument for reducing air pollution. This article presents the consequences of the emission reductions for the acidity of acid rain, and it discusses--in brief--the acid rain problem in light of current scientific knowledge. Finally, it answers the question of why forests did not die.</p>","PeriodicalId":89624,"journal":{"name":"Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"1 4","pages":"251-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Last century, at the end of the seventies, Europe was startled by a serious environmental problem: acid rain. Acid rain was held responsible for the decline of fishes in Scandinavian lakes. Later, it was suggested that acid rain could lead to forest dieback over vast areas of Europe. Forests in the Netherlands could be at great risk, as well. It was clear to everyone what it was all about, for 'rain' means water falling from the atmosphere and the meaning of 'acid' was evident, too. Acid rain caused much commotion in the eighties but, since then, it has faded into the background. Why is it, that there is so little attention paid to acid rain these days? Maybe the acid rain problem was a hype; with an exaggerated reaction to a problem that was, in fact, insignificant. This article aims to reconstruct the history of one of the most prominent environmental problems of the twentieth century. The article describes the origin of the acid rain problem in the 1960s and describes the scientific research that was carried out to develop a better understanding of the problem from an atmospheric chemical point of view. Subsequently, it treats the rise of public awareness in the seventies. The article subsequently focuses on the situation in the Netherlands. The initial research into forest health showed alarming results. This led to widespread concern within The Netherlands, which, once more, urged the government to come into action. Some measures to reduce air-polluting emissions were already taken in the early 1980s. However, these were meant, mainly, to improve local air quality. As the eighties progressed, acid rain provided an additional argument for reducing air pollution. This article presents the consequences of the emission reductions for the acidity of acid rain, and it discusses--in brief--the acid rain problem in light of current scientific knowledge. Finally, it answers the question of why forests did not die.

昨天,今天,明天。回顾酸雨问题]。
上世纪70年代末,一个严重的环境问题震惊了欧洲:酸雨。酸雨被认为是斯堪的纳维亚湖泊鱼类数量减少的原因。后来,有人提出酸雨可能导致欧洲大片地区的森林枯死。荷兰的森林也可能面临巨大的风险。每个人都很清楚这是怎么回事,因为“雨”是指从大气中落下的水,“酸”的意思也很明显。酸雨在八十年代引起了很大的骚动,但从那时起,它就逐渐淡出了人们的视野。为什么现在很少有人关注酸雨呢?也许酸雨问题是一种炒作;对一个其实无关紧要的问题做出夸张的反应。本文旨在重建二十世纪最突出的环境问题之一的历史。本文描述了20世纪60年代酸雨问题的起源,并描述了从大气化学的角度更好地理解酸雨问题所进行的科学研究。随后论述了七十年代公众意识的兴起。这篇文章随后着重讨论了荷兰的情况。对森林健康的初步研究显示了令人震惊的结果。这引起了荷兰国内的广泛关注,并再次敦促政府采取行动。一些减少空气污染排放的措施早在1980年代初就已采取。然而,这些措施主要是为了改善当地的空气质量。随着八十年代的发展,酸雨为减少空气污染提供了额外的论据。本文提出了减排对酸雨酸度的影响,并根据目前的科学知识简要地讨论了酸雨问题。最后,它回答了为什么森林没有消亡的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信