The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-04
Jane B Lemaire, Jean E Wallace, Adriane M Lewin, Jill de Grood, Jeffrey P Schaefer
{"title":"The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Jane B Lemaire,&nbsp;Jean E Wallace,&nbsp;Adriane M Lewin,&nbsp;Jill de Grood,&nbsp;Jeffrey P Schaefer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians often experience work-related stress that may lead to personal harm and impaired professional performance. Biofeedback has been used to manage stress in various populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a biofeedback-based stress management tool, consisting of rhythmic breathing, actively self-generated positive emotions and a portable biofeedback device, reduces physician stress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial measuring efficacy of a stress-reduction intervention over 28 days, with a 28-day open-label trial extension to assess effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty staff physicians (23 men and 17 women) from various medical practices (1 from primary care, 30 from a medical specialty and 9 from a surgical specialty) were recruited by means of electronic mail, regular mail and posters placed in the physicians' lounge and throughout the hospital.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Physicians in the intervention group were instructed to use a biofeedback-based stress management tool three times daily. Participants in both the control and intervention groups received twice-weekly support visits from the research team over 28 days, with the intervention group also receiving re-inforcement in the use of the stress management tool during these support visits. During the 28-day extension period, both the control and the intervention groups received the intervention, but without intensive support from the research team.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Stress was measured with a scale developed to capture short-term changes in global perceptions of stress for physicians (maximum score 200).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the randomized controlled trial (days 0 to 28), the mean stress score declined significantly for the intervention group (change -14.7, standard deviation [SD] 23.8; p = 0.013) but not for the control group (change -2.2, SD 8.4; p = 0.30). The difference in mean score change between the groups was 12.5 (p = 0.048). The lower mean stress scores in the intervention group were maintained during the trial extension to day 56. The mean stress score for the control group changed significantly during the 28-day extension period (change -8.5, SD 7.6; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A biofeedback-based stress management tool may be a simple and effective stress-reduction strategy for physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e154-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/ac/OpenMed-05-e154.PMC3345375.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians often experience work-related stress that may lead to personal harm and impaired professional performance. Biofeedback has been used to manage stress in various populations.

Objective: To determine whether a biofeedback-based stress management tool, consisting of rhythmic breathing, actively self-generated positive emotions and a portable biofeedback device, reduces physician stress.

Design: Randomized controlled trial measuring efficacy of a stress-reduction intervention over 28 days, with a 28-day open-label trial extension to assess effectiveness.

Setting: Urban tertiary care hospital.

Participants: Forty staff physicians (23 men and 17 women) from various medical practices (1 from primary care, 30 from a medical specialty and 9 from a surgical specialty) were recruited by means of electronic mail, regular mail and posters placed in the physicians' lounge and throughout the hospital.

Intervention: Physicians in the intervention group were instructed to use a biofeedback-based stress management tool three times daily. Participants in both the control and intervention groups received twice-weekly support visits from the research team over 28 days, with the intervention group also receiving re-inforcement in the use of the stress management tool during these support visits. During the 28-day extension period, both the control and the intervention groups received the intervention, but without intensive support from the research team.

Main outcome measure: Stress was measured with a scale developed to capture short-term changes in global perceptions of stress for physicians (maximum score 200).

Results: During the randomized controlled trial (days 0 to 28), the mean stress score declined significantly for the intervention group (change -14.7, standard deviation [SD] 23.8; p = 0.013) but not for the control group (change -2.2, SD 8.4; p = 0.30). The difference in mean score change between the groups was 12.5 (p = 0.048). The lower mean stress scores in the intervention group were maintained during the trial extension to day 56. The mean stress score for the control group changed significantly during the 28-day extension period (change -8.5, SD 7.6; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A biofeedback-based stress management tool may be a simple and effective stress-reduction strategy for physicians.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于生物反馈的压力管理工具对医生压力的影响:一项随机对照临床试验
背景:医生经常经历工作压力,这可能导致人身伤害和专业表现受损。生物反馈已被用于管理各种人群的压力。目的:探讨一种基于生物反馈的压力管理工具,包括有节奏的呼吸、主动自我产生的积极情绪和便携式生物反馈装置,是否能减轻医生的压力。设计:随机对照试验在28天内测量减压干预的效果,并进行为期28天的开放标签延长试验以评估效果。环境:城市三级保健医院。参与者:通过电子邮件、普通邮件和在医生休息室和整个医院张贴的海报,从各种医疗机构(1名来自初级保健,30名来自医学专业,9名来自外科专业)招募了40名工作人员医生(23名男性和17名女性)。干预:干预组的医生被要求每天三次使用基于生物反馈的压力管理工具。对照组和干预组的参与者在28天内接受了研究小组每周两次的支持访问,干预组在这些支持访问期间也接受了压力管理工具使用的加强。在28天的延长期内,对照组和干预组都接受了干预,但没有得到研究小组的大力支持。主要结果测量:压力是用一个量表来测量的,该量表旨在捕捉医生对压力的全球认知的短期变化(最高得分200)。结果:在随机对照试验期间(第0 ~ 28天),干预组的平均应激评分显著下降(变化-14.7,标准差[SD] 23.8;p = 0.013),但对照组没有(变化-2.2,SD 8.4;P = 0.30)。两组平均评分变化差异为12.5 (p = 0.048)。在试验延长至第56天期间,干预组保持较低的平均压力得分。对照组的平均应激评分在28天的延长期内变化显著(change -8.5, SD 7.6;P < 0.001)。结论:基于生物反馈的压力管理工具可能是一种简单有效的减压策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信