Photoelastic determination of polymerization shrinkage stress in low-shrinkage resin composites.

Inga Rullmann, Anke Schattenberg, Miriam Marx, Brita Willershausen, Claus-Peter Ernst
{"title":"Photoelastic determination of polymerization shrinkage stress in low-shrinkage resin composites.","authors":"Inga Rullmann,&nbsp;Anke Schattenberg,&nbsp;Miriam Marx,&nbsp;Brita Willershausen,&nbsp;Claus-Peter Ernst","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-shrinkage resin composites are in the focus of research in posterior resin composite restoratives. The aim of the study was to examine the polymerization shrinkage stress of new composites (Venus Diamond/ Heraeus Kulzer; SDR/DENTSPLY) and an experimental low-shrinkage resin composite (Ormocer/VOCO) in comparison to established low-shrinkage resin composites (Filtek Silorane/ 3M ESPE; els/Saremco; Filtek Supreme XT/3M ESPE; Clearfil Majesty Posterior/Kuraray). Cylindrical cavities (∅ 4 mm) in Araldit-B epoxy resin plates (40×40×4 mm) were pretreated with the Rocatec system to ensure bonding of the resin composites. The resin composite specimens (n = 10) were exposed to light for 60 s with a QTH curing device (Translux energy, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany). The samples were stored dark and dry (23 °C). Polymeri-zation shrinkage stress data (MPa) 4 min and 24 h post exposure were calculated based on the diameter of the first-order isochromatic rings, obtained from the Araldit plates. The statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out with the Wilcoxon test (p = 0.05). After 24 h, the following mean stress values and standard deviations were obtained: Venus Diamond 3.4 ± 0.27 MPa; SDR 3.3 ± 0.26 MPa; exp. Ormocer 4.0 ± 0.18 MPa; Filtek Silorane 2.8 ± 0.19 MPa; els 2.5 ± 0.09 MPa; Filtek Supreme XT 6.0 ± 0.20 MPa; and Clearfil Majesty Posterior 5.6 ± 0.15 MPa. For all materials, higher polymerization stress values were recorded after 24 h. All differences in the shrinkage data obtained after 24 h were statistically significant (p < 0.05) except Venus Diamond/SDR. Venus Diamond, els and SDR showed shrinkage data closer to that of Filtek Silorane.</p>","PeriodicalId":74765,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","volume":"122 4","pages":"294-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-shrinkage resin composites are in the focus of research in posterior resin composite restoratives. The aim of the study was to examine the polymerization shrinkage stress of new composites (Venus Diamond/ Heraeus Kulzer; SDR/DENTSPLY) and an experimental low-shrinkage resin composite (Ormocer/VOCO) in comparison to established low-shrinkage resin composites (Filtek Silorane/ 3M ESPE; els/Saremco; Filtek Supreme XT/3M ESPE; Clearfil Majesty Posterior/Kuraray). Cylindrical cavities (∅ 4 mm) in Araldit-B epoxy resin plates (40×40×4 mm) were pretreated with the Rocatec system to ensure bonding of the resin composites. The resin composite specimens (n = 10) were exposed to light for 60 s with a QTH curing device (Translux energy, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany). The samples were stored dark and dry (23 °C). Polymeri-zation shrinkage stress data (MPa) 4 min and 24 h post exposure were calculated based on the diameter of the first-order isochromatic rings, obtained from the Araldit plates. The statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out with the Wilcoxon test (p = 0.05). After 24 h, the following mean stress values and standard deviations were obtained: Venus Diamond 3.4 ± 0.27 MPa; SDR 3.3 ± 0.26 MPa; exp. Ormocer 4.0 ± 0.18 MPa; Filtek Silorane 2.8 ± 0.19 MPa; els 2.5 ± 0.09 MPa; Filtek Supreme XT 6.0 ± 0.20 MPa; and Clearfil Majesty Posterior 5.6 ± 0.15 MPa. For all materials, higher polymerization stress values were recorded after 24 h. All differences in the shrinkage data obtained after 24 h were statistically significant (p < 0.05) except Venus Diamond/SDR. Venus Diamond, els and SDR showed shrinkage data closer to that of Filtek Silorane.

低收缩树脂复合材料聚合收缩应力的光弹性测定。
低收缩树脂复合材料是后路树脂复合材料修复体研究的热点。本研究的目的是研究新型复合材料(Venus Diamond/ Heraeus Kulzer;SDR/DENTSPLY)和实验性低收缩树脂复合材料(Ormocer/VOCO)与现有的低收缩树脂复合材料(Filtek Silorane/ 3M ESPE;船/ Saremco;Filtek Supreme XT/3M ESPE;清理威严后方/库拉雷)。在Araldit-B环氧树脂板(40×40×4 mm)上用Rocatec系统进行预处理,以保证树脂复合材料的粘接。采用QTH固化装置(Translux energy, Heraeus Kulzer,德国),将10个树脂复合材料样品暴露在光下60 s。样品在暗处干燥(23°C)保存。根据从Araldit板上获得的一阶等色环直径计算曝光后4 min和24 h的聚合收缩应力数据(MPa)。所得资料采用Wilcoxon检验进行统计学分析(p = 0.05)。24h后得到的平均应力值及标准差如下:Venus Diamond 3.4±0.27 MPa;SDR 3.3±0.26 MPa;实验温度:4.0±0.18 MPa;Filtek Silorane 2.8±0.19 MPa;els 2.5±0.09 MPa;Filtek Supreme XT 6.0±0.20 MPa;清洁威严后路5.6±0.15 MPa。所有材料在24h后均出现较高的聚合应力值。除Venus Diamond/SDR外,24h后的收缩率数据差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。Venus Diamond、els和SDR的收缩率数据更接近Filtek Silorane。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信