The Effect of Nesiritide on Renal Function and Other Clinical Parameters in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Iosif Kelesidis MD, Jeremy Mazurek MD, Pankaj Khullar MD, Wajeeha Saeed MD, Timothy Vittorio MD, Ronald Zolty MD, PhD
{"title":"The Effect of Nesiritide on Renal Function and Other Clinical Parameters in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction","authors":"Iosif Kelesidis MD,&nbsp;Jeremy Mazurek MD,&nbsp;Pankaj Khullar MD,&nbsp;Wajeeha Saeed MD,&nbsp;Timothy Vittorio MD,&nbsp;Ronald Zolty MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00272.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The role of nesiritide in patients with decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (dHFpEF) has not been previously studied. In this investigation, the authors retrospectively analyzed the effect of nesiritide on renal function and clinical outcomes in patients admitted with dHFpEF. Of the 658 patients included, 328 were treated with nesiritide while 330 patients were treated with standard diuretic therapy. In both the nesiritide and no nesiritide groups, there was a significant change in mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine at 72 hours as well as at day of discharge (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). This trend did not progress at 1 month in the nesiritide group, although it did in the no nesiritide group. At 1 month after therapy, however, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the mean change of GFR and creatinine (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). There was no significant difference in &gt;25% decrease of GFR anytime through day 30 (25% vs 29.69%, <i>P</i>=.236) between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, nesiritide was an important predictor of renal function at 1 month (<i>P</i>&lt;.05). Thus, nesiritide can be administered safely without negatively impacting long-term renal function in patients admitted with dHFpEF. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":83668,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","volume":"18 3","pages":"158-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00272.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00272.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The role of nesiritide in patients with decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (dHFpEF) has not been previously studied. In this investigation, the authors retrospectively analyzed the effect of nesiritide on renal function and clinical outcomes in patients admitted with dHFpEF. Of the 658 patients included, 328 were treated with nesiritide while 330 patients were treated with standard diuretic therapy. In both the nesiritide and no nesiritide groups, there was a significant change in mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine at 72 hours as well as at day of discharge (P<.001). This trend did not progress at 1 month in the nesiritide group, although it did in the no nesiritide group. At 1 month after therapy, however, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the mean change of GFR and creatinine (P<.001). There was no significant difference in >25% decrease of GFR anytime through day 30 (25% vs 29.69%, P=.236) between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, nesiritide was an important predictor of renal function at 1 month (P<.05). Thus, nesiritide can be administered safely without negatively impacting long-term renal function in patients admitted with dHFpEF. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Image

奈西立肽对失代偿性心力衰竭及保留射血分数患者肾功能及其他临床参数的影响
奈西立肽在保留射血分数(dHFpEF)失代偿性心力衰竭患者中的作用尚未被研究。在这项研究中,作者回顾性分析了奈西立肽对dHFpEF患者肾功能和临床结局的影响。在纳入的658例患者中,328例患者接受奈西立肽治疗,330例患者接受标准利尿剂治疗。在奈西立肽组和无奈西立肽组中,72小时和出院当天的平均肾小球滤过率(GFR)和肌酐均有显著变化(P<.001)。这一趋势在奈西立肽组1个月时没有进展,尽管在无奈西立肽组有进展。然而,在治疗后1个月,两组GFR和肌酐的平均变化有显著差异(P< 0.001)。在第30天的任何时候,两组之间GFR下降>25%无显著差异(25% vs 29.69%, P= 0.236)。在多变量分析中,奈西立肽是1个月肾功能的重要预测因子(P< 0.05)。因此,对于入院的dHFpEF患者,奈西立肽可以安全地给予,而不会对长期肾功能产生负面影响。©2011 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书