Evaluation of Micromovements and Stresses around Single Wide-Diameter and Double Implants for Replacing Mandibular Molar: A Three-Dimensional FEA.

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-07 DOI:10.5402/2012/680587
Shrikar R Desai, I Karthikeyan, Rika Singh
{"title":"Evaluation of Micromovements and Stresses around Single Wide-Diameter and Double Implants for Replacing Mandibular Molar: A Three-Dimensional FEA.","authors":"Shrikar R Desai,&nbsp;I Karthikeyan,&nbsp;Rika Singh","doi":"10.5402/2012/680587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. The purpose of this finite element study was to compare stresses, strains, and displacements of double versus single implant, in immediate loading for replacing mandibular molar. Materials and Methods. Two 3D FEM models were made to simulate implant designs. The first model used 6 mm wide-diameter implant to support a single molar crown. The second model used 3.75-3.75 double implant design. Each model was analyzed with a single force magnitude of 70 N in oblique axis in three locations. Results. This FEM study suggested that micromotion can be well controlled by both double implants and 6 mm single wide-diameter implant. The Von Mises stress for double implant had 31%-43% stress reduction compared to the 6 mm implant. Conclusion. Within the limitations of the paper, when the mesiodistal space for artificial tooth is more than 12.5 mm, under immediate loading, the double implant support should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2012 ","pages":"680587"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3313580/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/680587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this finite element study was to compare stresses, strains, and displacements of double versus single implant, in immediate loading for replacing mandibular molar. Materials and Methods. Two 3D FEM models were made to simulate implant designs. The first model used 6 mm wide-diameter implant to support a single molar crown. The second model used 3.75-3.75 double implant design. Each model was analyzed with a single force magnitude of 70 N in oblique axis in three locations. Results. This FEM study suggested that micromotion can be well controlled by both double implants and 6 mm single wide-diameter implant. The Von Mises stress for double implant had 31%-43% stress reduction compared to the 6 mm implant. Conclusion. Within the limitations of the paper, when the mesiodistal space for artificial tooth is more than 12.5 mm, under immediate loading, the double implant support should be considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单颗大直径种植体和双颗种植体置换下颌磨牙的微运动和应力评价:三维有限元分析。
目的。本有限元研究的目的是比较双种植体和单种植体在更换下颌磨牙时的应力、应变和位移。材料与方法。建立了两个三维有限元模型来模拟种植体的设计。第一种模型采用直径6毫米宽的种植体支撑单个臼齿冠。第二个模型采用3.75-3.75双种植体设计。每个模型在三个位置的斜轴上以单一的70 N的力进行分析。结果。本研究表明,双种植体和6 mm宽直径单种植体均能很好地控制微动。与6mm种植体相比,双种植体的Von Mises应力降低31% ~ 43%。结论。在本文研究范围内,当人工牙中远端间隙大于12.5 mm时,在即刻载荷下,应考虑采用双种植体支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信