Inclusion of individuals with special needs in regular education: a literature review.

Fabiana Trevisani Silva, Eduardo Augusto Vella Gonçalves, Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga
{"title":"Inclusion of individuals with special needs in regular education: a literature review.","authors":"Fabiana Trevisani Silva,&nbsp;Eduardo Augusto Vella Gonçalves,&nbsp;Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga","doi":"10.1590/s2179-64912012000100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To critically analyze the inclusion of individuals with special needs in regular education in Brazil, considering social and legal aspects, through literature review.</p><p><strong>Research strategy: </strong>The literature search was conducted in open access databases: LILACS, SciELO, Portal Cochrane and IUSDATA, the latter belonging to the Library of the Law School of the University of São Paulo, considering all articles published until December 2010. The search strategy used the following keywords: inclusive education; special education; inclusive proposal; individuals with special needs.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>In the search, only studies in which the summary or the body of the article were related to the purpose of the study were evaluated and selected.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>The potentially relevant articles for review were presented in a protocol form containing the eligibility criteria of the study, methods used, characteristics of the analyzed group or manuscripts, type of intervention used in the study, and results obtained. Articles classified as expert opinions, despite their low level of scientific evidence, were considered in this work, since they are often found in the literature on the issue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,399 articles was found and 120 potentially relevant articles were selected after reading their abstracts. From these, 67 articles were cited in more than one database, which resulted in 53 articles to be fully read. Fifteen of these articles were excluded after reading because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thus, 38 studies were included and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following a critical analysis of the literature in the field, it was concluded that, so far, in general, the school receives individuals with special needs; however, there is a long way to go to actually include these individuals, although Brazil has the scope of inclusion. Therefore, it is necessary to establish public policies and guidelines aimed at effective inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":89403,"journal":{"name":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","volume":"24 1","pages":"96-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s2179-64912012000100017","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-64912012000100017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: To critically analyze the inclusion of individuals with special needs in regular education in Brazil, considering social and legal aspects, through literature review.

Research strategy: The literature search was conducted in open access databases: LILACS, SciELO, Portal Cochrane and IUSDATA, the latter belonging to the Library of the Law School of the University of São Paulo, considering all articles published until December 2010. The search strategy used the following keywords: inclusive education; special education; inclusive proposal; individuals with special needs.

Selection criteria: In the search, only studies in which the summary or the body of the article were related to the purpose of the study were evaluated and selected.

Data analysis: The potentially relevant articles for review were presented in a protocol form containing the eligibility criteria of the study, methods used, characteristics of the analyzed group or manuscripts, type of intervention used in the study, and results obtained. Articles classified as expert opinions, despite their low level of scientific evidence, were considered in this work, since they are often found in the literature on the issue.

Results: A total of 1,399 articles was found and 120 potentially relevant articles were selected after reading their abstracts. From these, 67 articles were cited in more than one database, which resulted in 53 articles to be fully read. Fifteen of these articles were excluded after reading because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thus, 38 studies were included and analyzed.

Conclusion: Following a critical analysis of the literature in the field, it was concluded that, so far, in general, the school receives individuals with special needs; however, there is a long way to go to actually include these individuals, although Brazil has the scope of inclusion. Therefore, it is necessary to establish public policies and guidelines aimed at effective inclusion.

在普通教育中纳入有特殊需要的个人:文献综述。
目的:通过文献综述,从社会和法律角度,批判性地分析巴西普通教育中有特殊需要的个人的纳入情况。研究策略:文献检索在开放获取数据库中进行:LILACS, SciELO, Portal Cochrane和IUSDATA,后者属于圣保罗大学法学院图书馆,考虑到2010年12月之前发表的所有文章。搜索策略使用了以下关键词:全纳教育;特殊教育;包容的建议;有特殊需要的人。选择标准:在检索中,仅评估和选择与研究目的相关的摘要或正文的研究。数据分析:潜在的相关文献以方案形式呈现,包括研究的资格标准、使用的方法、分析组或手稿的特征、研究中使用的干预类型和获得的结果。被归类为专家意见的文章,尽管它们的科学证据水平低,但在这项工作中被考虑,因为它们经常在有关该问题的文献中找到。结果:共检索到1399篇文献,通过阅读文献摘要筛选出120篇具有潜在相关性的文献。其中67篇文章在一个以上的数据库中被引用,53篇文章被完全阅读。其中15篇文章因不符合纳入标准而被排除。因此,我们纳入并分析了38项研究。结论:在对该领域的文献进行批判性分析后,得出的结论是,到目前为止,总的来说,学校接收有特殊需要的个人;然而,要真正把这些人包括在内还有很长的路要走,尽管巴西已经有了纳入的范围。因此,有必要制定旨在有效包容的公共政策和指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书