New patient-centered care standards from the commission on cancer: opportunities and challenges.

The journal of supportive oncology Pub Date : 2012-05-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.suponc.2011.12.002
Lola A Fashoyin-Aje, Kathryn A Martinez, Sydney M Dy
{"title":"New patient-centered care standards from the commission on cancer: opportunities and challenges.","authors":"Lola A Fashoyin-Aje,&nbsp;Kathryn A Martinez,&nbsp;Sydney M Dy","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2011.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons publishes accreditation standards that hospitals and cancer treatment centers implement to ensure quality care to cancer patients. These standards address the full spectrum of cancer care, from cancer prevention to survivorship and end-of-life care. The most recent revisions of these standards included new standards in \"patient-centered areas,\" including the provision of palliative care services, treatment and survivorship plans, psychological distress screening, and patient navigation programs. Unified by their emphasis on the early identification of patients at risk of receiving suboptimal care and the importance of ensuring that issues arising during and after completion of cancer treatment are addressed, they are a welcome expansion of the standards guiding cancer care. As with all standards, however, the next steps will be to further define how they will be implemented and to determine how success will be assessed. This will require ongoing critical evaluation of the standards and their implementation, including the need for member institutions to define successful implementation methods and measurable outcomes and identification of areas most in need of further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"10 3","pages":"107-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.12.002","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

The Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons publishes accreditation standards that hospitals and cancer treatment centers implement to ensure quality care to cancer patients. These standards address the full spectrum of cancer care, from cancer prevention to survivorship and end-of-life care. The most recent revisions of these standards included new standards in "patient-centered areas," including the provision of palliative care services, treatment and survivorship plans, psychological distress screening, and patient navigation programs. Unified by their emphasis on the early identification of patients at risk of receiving suboptimal care and the importance of ensuring that issues arising during and after completion of cancer treatment are addressed, they are a welcome expansion of the standards guiding cancer care. As with all standards, however, the next steps will be to further define how they will be implemented and to determine how success will be assessed. This will require ongoing critical evaluation of the standards and their implementation, including the need for member institutions to define successful implementation methods and measurable outcomes and identification of areas most in need of further research.

来自癌症委员会的以病人为中心的新护理标准:机遇与挑战。
美国外科医师学会癌症委员会发布了医院和癌症治疗中心实施的认证标准,以确保对癌症患者的高质量护理。这些标准涉及癌症护理的方方面面,从癌症预防到幸存者和临终关怀。这些标准的最新修订包括“以患者为中心的领域”的新标准,包括提供姑息治疗服务、治疗和生存计划、心理困扰筛查和患者导航程序。它们强调早期识别有接受次优治疗风险的患者,并强调确保在癌症治疗期间和完成后出现的问题得到解决的重要性,因此它们是指导癌症治疗标准的一个受欢迎的扩展。然而,与所有标准一样,接下来的步骤将是进一步确定如何实施这些标准,并确定如何评估成功。这将需要对标准及其实施情况进行持续的批判性评估,包括成员机构需要确定成功的实施方法和可衡量的结果,并确定最需要进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信