The comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia.

ISRN pediatrics Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-04-05 DOI:10.5402/2011/219287
Seyed Mohsen Dehghani, Mohammad Hadi Imanieh, Roya Oboodi, Mahmood Haghighat
{"title":"The comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia.","authors":"Seyed Mohsen Dehghani,&nbsp;Mohammad Hadi Imanieh,&nbsp;Roya Oboodi,&nbsp;Mahmood Haghighat","doi":"10.5402/2011/219287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic disorder with non specific upper abdominal pain or discomfort. Different approaches with anti-secretory, spasmolytic, prokinetic and anti-inflammatory effects and most preferably reduction of visceral hypersensitivity seem logical. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of the four most drugs used for treatment of dyspepsia in children. Methods. 169 patients between 2 to 16 years old that 47.3% was male and 52.7% was female were enrolled in this clinical trial study by the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia. Then for each patient one of the drugs; Omeprazole, Famotidine, Ranitidine or Cimetidine was administered, for a period of 4 weeks. Patients were followed after 2 and 6 weeks from the beginning of the treatment. Results. The distribution of drugs between these patients were including; 21.9% with Cimetidine, 21.3% with Famotidine, 30.8% with Omeperazole and 26% with Ranitidine that the proportion of patients with all symptoms relief were: 21.6% for Cimetidine, 44.4% for Famotidine, 53.8% for Omeprazole and 43.2% for Cimetidine (P = .024). In followups within 2 and 6 weeks after beginning medical therapy, no side effects due to drugs were seen. Conclusion. If a cure is defined as all symptoms relief after a period of 4 weeks treatment, our findings showed that Omeperazole are superior to Ranitidine, Famotidine, and Cimetidine for management of functional dyspepsia.</p>","PeriodicalId":73521,"journal":{"name":"ISRN pediatrics","volume":"2011 ","pages":"219287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2011/219287","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/219287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background. Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic disorder with non specific upper abdominal pain or discomfort. Different approaches with anti-secretory, spasmolytic, prokinetic and anti-inflammatory effects and most preferably reduction of visceral hypersensitivity seem logical. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of the four most drugs used for treatment of dyspepsia in children. Methods. 169 patients between 2 to 16 years old that 47.3% was male and 52.7% was female were enrolled in this clinical trial study by the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia. Then for each patient one of the drugs; Omeprazole, Famotidine, Ranitidine or Cimetidine was administered, for a period of 4 weeks. Patients were followed after 2 and 6 weeks from the beginning of the treatment. Results. The distribution of drugs between these patients were including; 21.9% with Cimetidine, 21.3% with Famotidine, 30.8% with Omeperazole and 26% with Ranitidine that the proportion of patients with all symptoms relief were: 21.6% for Cimetidine, 44.4% for Famotidine, 53.8% for Omeprazole and 43.2% for Cimetidine (P = .024). In followups within 2 and 6 weeks after beginning medical therapy, no side effects due to drugs were seen. Conclusion. If a cure is defined as all symptoms relief after a period of 4 weeks treatment, our findings showed that Omeperazole are superior to Ranitidine, Famotidine, and Cimetidine for management of functional dyspepsia.

西咪替丁、雷尼替丁、法莫替丁、奥美拉唑治疗儿童消化不良疗效的比较研究。
背景。功能性消化不良是一种常见的慢性疾病,伴有非特异性上腹部疼痛或不适。不同的方法具有抗分泌、解痉、促动力学和抗炎作用,最理想的是减少内脏过敏似乎是合乎逻辑的。在这项研究中,我们比较了治疗儿童消化不良最常用的四种药物的有效性。方法:169例2 ~ 16岁的患者,男性47.3%,女性52.7%,被诊断为功能性消化不良。然后给每个病人一种药物;给予奥美拉唑、法莫替丁、雷尼替丁或西咪替丁,疗程4周。分别于治疗开始后2周和6周进行随访。结果。这些患者之间的药物分布包括;西咪替丁21.9%、法莫替丁21.3%、奥美拉唑30.8%、雷尼替丁26%,全部症状缓解的患者比例分别为:西咪替丁21.6%、法莫替丁44.4%、奥美拉唑53.8%、西咪替丁43.2% (P = 0.024)。在开始药物治疗后2周和6周的随访中,未见药物引起的副作用。结论。如果治愈的定义是治疗4周后所有症状缓解,我们的研究结果表明奥美拉唑在治疗功能性消化不良方面优于雷尼替丁、法莫替丁和西咪替丁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信