[Evolution of infectious disease diagnostic testing and the possible use of genetic testing].

Kazuyuki Sugahara
{"title":"[Evolution of infectious disease diagnostic testing and the possible use of genetic testing].","authors":"Kazuyuki Sugahara","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A diagnostic test for infection has been developed which uses the culture method but there still remains the issue of non-culturable pathogens. Although genetic testing has emerged as a solution to this problem, it is not yet widely used. There are various reasons for this which includes the gene amplification and analysis methods used as well as the users not being familiar with the selection criteria. In recent years, by using inexpensive instrumentation it has become possible to observe specimens using fluorescent staining and to easily identify the pathogens. Also equipment for gene and protein analysis has been developed that can analyze each level of gene transcription and translation in the expressed proteins. Today, due to the many developments in both analytical methods and instrumentation, major breakthroughs are being made in clinical microbiological testing. That is, first, to classify the infecting microorganism by fluorescent staining and then to identify the microorganism using DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry. In addition, the DNA sequencing and Melting curve analysis methods are used to test for antimicrobial resistance of infectious microorganisms. For non-culturable microbes and the growth response of microbes under stress conditions, the Phenotype-Microarray method is used. Therefore, once the weaknesses of each method are understood, it is possible to provide accurate and timely information to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"22 1-2","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A diagnostic test for infection has been developed which uses the culture method but there still remains the issue of non-culturable pathogens. Although genetic testing has emerged as a solution to this problem, it is not yet widely used. There are various reasons for this which includes the gene amplification and analysis methods used as well as the users not being familiar with the selection criteria. In recent years, by using inexpensive instrumentation it has become possible to observe specimens using fluorescent staining and to easily identify the pathogens. Also equipment for gene and protein analysis has been developed that can analyze each level of gene transcription and translation in the expressed proteins. Today, due to the many developments in both analytical methods and instrumentation, major breakthroughs are being made in clinical microbiological testing. That is, first, to classify the infecting microorganism by fluorescent staining and then to identify the microorganism using DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry. In addition, the DNA sequencing and Melting curve analysis methods are used to test for antimicrobial resistance of infectious microorganisms. For non-culturable microbes and the growth response of microbes under stress conditions, the Phenotype-Microarray method is used. Therefore, once the weaknesses of each method are understood, it is possible to provide accurate and timely information to clinicians.

[传染病诊断检测的演变和基因检测的可能应用]。
已经开发出一种使用培养法的感染诊断试验,但仍然存在不可培养病原体的问题。虽然基因检测已经成为解决这一问题的一种方法,但它尚未得到广泛应用。造成这种情况的原因有很多,包括使用的基因扩增和分析方法,以及用户不熟悉选择标准。近年来,通过使用廉价的仪器,可以使用荧光染色观察标本并容易地识别病原体。此外,用于基因和蛋白质分析的设备已经开发出来,可以分析表达蛋白中基因转录和翻译的各个水平。今天,由于分析方法和仪器的许多发展,临床微生物检测正在取得重大突破。即先用荧光染色法对感染微生物进行分类,再用DNA测序和质谱法对微生物进行鉴定。此外,采用DNA测序和熔融曲线分析方法检测感染微生物的耐药性。对于不可培养的微生物和微生物在胁迫条件下的生长反应,使用表型微阵列方法。因此,一旦了解了每种方法的弱点,就有可能为临床医生提供准确和及时的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信