Impact of the perioperative care model on mortality of patients treated in general surgery wards.

Anestezjologia intensywna terapia Pub Date : 2011-10-01
Mariusz Piechota
{"title":"Impact of the perioperative care model on mortality of patients treated in general surgery wards.","authors":"Mariusz Piechota","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of perioperative death in general surgery wards depends on many factors, including the underlying disease, type of surgical intervention and model of perioperative management. The aim of the study was to determine the reasons for major differences in mortality rates recorded in general surgery wards of the three university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study was carried out and involved the data of 32 231 surgical patients. In one of the hospitals, postoperative patients were treated in the recovery room supervised by anaesthetists; in the remaining two, perioperative care was delivered by surgical ward staff. A multiple regression model with random effects was used to adjust for differences in three death risk groups of patients according to underlying diseases: low, moderate and high.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the hospital with postoperative care administered by anaesthetic staff the mortality rate was 0.45 whereas in the two remaining ones with postoperative patients supervised by surgical staff - 1.86 and 2.52. In each group, increased mortality was observed among patients receiving therapy in general surgery wards after transfer from another hospital ward.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major factor determining the mortality rates in general surgery wards is the model of perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":88221,"journal":{"name":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","volume":"43 4","pages":"208-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of perioperative death in general surgery wards depends on many factors, including the underlying disease, type of surgical intervention and model of perioperative management. The aim of the study was to determine the reasons for major differences in mortality rates recorded in general surgery wards of the three university hospitals.

Methods: The retrospective study was carried out and involved the data of 32 231 surgical patients. In one of the hospitals, postoperative patients were treated in the recovery room supervised by anaesthetists; in the remaining two, perioperative care was delivered by surgical ward staff. A multiple regression model with random effects was used to adjust for differences in three death risk groups of patients according to underlying diseases: low, moderate and high.

Results: In the hospital with postoperative care administered by anaesthetic staff the mortality rate was 0.45 whereas in the two remaining ones with postoperative patients supervised by surgical staff - 1.86 and 2.52. In each group, increased mortality was observed among patients receiving therapy in general surgery wards after transfer from another hospital ward.

Conclusion: The major factor determining the mortality rates in general surgery wards is the model of perioperative management.

围手术期护理模式对普外科病房患者死亡率的影响。
背景:普通外科病房围手术期死亡的风险取决于多种因素,包括基础疾病、手术干预类型和围手术期管理模式。该研究的目的是确定三所大学附属医院普通外科病房记录的死亡率存在重大差异的原因。方法:对32 231例手术患者进行回顾性研究。在其中一家医院,术后患者在恢复室接受治疗,由麻醉师监督;在其余两例中,围手术期护理由外科病房工作人员提供。采用随机效应的多元回归模型,对低、中、高三种基础疾病患者死亡风险组的差异进行校正。结果:术后有麻醉人员监护的医院死亡率为0.45,术后有外科人员监护的医院死亡率为1.86,术后有外科人员监护的医院死亡率为2.52。在每一组中,从其他医院病房转到普通外科病房接受治疗的患者死亡率均有所增加。结论:决定普通外科病房病死率的主要因素是围手术期管理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信