Clinical outcome of staged versus combined treatment approach of hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with visceral vessel debranching and aortic endograft exclusion.

Peter H Lin, Panagiotis Kougias, Carlos F Bechara, Sarah M Weakley, Faisal G Bakaeen, Scott A Lemaire, Joseph S Coselli
{"title":"Clinical outcome of staged versus combined treatment approach of hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with visceral vessel debranching and aortic endograft exclusion.","authors":"Peter H Lin,&nbsp;Panagiotis Kougias,&nbsp;Carlos F Bechara,&nbsp;Sarah M Weakley,&nbsp;Faisal G Bakaeen,&nbsp;Scott A Lemaire,&nbsp;Joseph S Coselli","doi":"10.1177/1531003511432768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although visceral vessel debranching and endovascular aneurysm exclusion represents a hybrid treatment approach in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, the effect of timing with regard to the visceral debranching procedure and endovascular aneurysm exclusion in this treatment strategy remains unclear. In this study, the authors analyzed their recent institutional experience of visceral debranching and aneurysm stent-grafting procedures. Specifically, the authors compared the effect of staged (n = 27) versus combined (n = 31) hybrid treatment in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. This study showed a higher incidence of renal insufficiency in patients undergoing a combined hybrid repair than the staged hybrid approach. The possibility of aneurysm rupture may exist in the staged treatment approach if the duration of staged repair is prolonged. The combined hybrid treatment strategy should be performed with caution as it is associated with significantly higher complication rates than the staged hybrid treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":87201,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","volume":"24 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003511432768","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003511432768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Although visceral vessel debranching and endovascular aneurysm exclusion represents a hybrid treatment approach in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, the effect of timing with regard to the visceral debranching procedure and endovascular aneurysm exclusion in this treatment strategy remains unclear. In this study, the authors analyzed their recent institutional experience of visceral debranching and aneurysm stent-grafting procedures. Specifically, the authors compared the effect of staged (n = 27) versus combined (n = 31) hybrid treatment in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. This study showed a higher incidence of renal insufficiency in patients undergoing a combined hybrid repair than the staged hybrid approach. The possibility of aneurysm rupture may exist in the staged treatment approach if the duration of staged repair is prolonged. The combined hybrid treatment strategy should be performed with caution as it is associated with significantly higher complication rates than the staged hybrid treatment modality.

分阶段与联合治疗胸腹主动脉瘤联合内脏血管去分支及主动脉内植物排除的临床疗效。
尽管内脏血管去分支和血管内动脉瘤排除是胸腹主动脉瘤患者的一种混合治疗方法,但在这种治疗策略中,内脏去分支手术和血管内动脉瘤排除的时机的影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,作者分析了他们最近的内脏去分支和动脉瘤支架移植手术的机构经验。具体来说,作者比较了分期(n = 27)和联合(n = 31)混合治疗对复杂主动脉瘤患者的效果。这项研究显示,在接受联合混合修复的患者中,肾功能不全的发生率高于分期混合修复方法。如果分阶段修复的时间延长,则分阶段治疗方法可能存在动脉瘤破裂的可能性。联合混合治疗策略应谨慎执行,因为其并发症发生率明显高于分阶段混合治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信