The cognitive neuroscience of true and false memories.

4区 心理学 Q2 Psychology
Marcia K Johnson, Carol L Raye, Karen J Mitchell, Elizabeth Ankudowich
{"title":"The cognitive neuroscience of true and false memories.","authors":"Marcia K Johnson,&nbsp;Carol L Raye,&nbsp;Karen J Mitchell,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ankudowich","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-1195-6_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of central relevance to the recovered/false memory debate is understanding the factors that cause us to believe that a mental experience is a memory of an actual past experience. According to the source monitoring framework (SMF), memories are attributions that we make about our mental experiences based on their subjective qualities, our prior knowledge and beliefs, our motives and goals, and the social context. From this perspective, we discuss cognitive behavioral studies using both objective (e.g., recognition, source memory) and subjective (e.g., ratings of memory characteristics) measures that provide much information about the encoding, revival and monitoring processes that yield both true and false memories. The chapter also considers how neuroimaging findings, especially from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, are contributing to our understanding of the relation between memory and reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":54204,"journal":{"name":"Nebraska Symposium on Motivation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-1195-6_2","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nebraska Symposium on Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1195-6_2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Of central relevance to the recovered/false memory debate is understanding the factors that cause us to believe that a mental experience is a memory of an actual past experience. According to the source monitoring framework (SMF), memories are attributions that we make about our mental experiences based on their subjective qualities, our prior knowledge and beliefs, our motives and goals, and the social context. From this perspective, we discuss cognitive behavioral studies using both objective (e.g., recognition, source memory) and subjective (e.g., ratings of memory characteristics) measures that provide much information about the encoding, revival and monitoring processes that yield both true and false memories. The chapter also considers how neuroimaging findings, especially from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, are contributing to our understanding of the relation between memory and reality.

真假记忆的认知神经科学。
恢复记忆/错误记忆之争的核心是理解导致我们相信心理体验是对过去实际体验的记忆的因素。根据源监测框架(SMF),记忆是我们对心理经历的主观属性、先验知识和信念、动机和目标以及社会背景所做出的归因。从这个角度来看,我们讨论了使用客观(例如,识别,源记忆)和主观(例如,记忆特征评级)测量的认知行为研究,这些测量提供了关于产生真实和虚假记忆的编码,恢复和监控过程的大量信息。本章还考虑了神经成像的发现,特别是功能性磁共振成像研究,如何有助于我们理解记忆和现实之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信