Assessment of proprioceptive allodynia after tooth-clenching exercises.

Journal of orofacial pain Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Andreas Dawson, Thomas List, Malin Ernberg, Peter Svensson
{"title":"Assessment of proprioceptive allodynia after tooth-clenching exercises.","authors":"Andreas Dawson,&nbsp;Thomas List,&nbsp;Malin Ernberg,&nbsp;Peter Svensson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To (A) evaluate test-retest reliability of vibrotactile sensitivity in the masseter muscle and (B) test if (1) the vibration threshold is decreased after experimental tooth clenching, (2) intense vibrations exacerbate pain after tooth clenching, (3) pain and fatigue are increased after tooth clenching, and (4) pressure pain thresholds are decreased after tooth clenching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In part A, 25 healthy female volunteers (mean age: 42 ± 12 years) participated, and 16 healthy females (mean age 32 ± 10 years) participated in three 60-minute sessions, each with 24- and 48-hour follow-ups in part B. Participants were randomly assigned tooth-clenching exercises with clenching levels of 10%, 20%, or 40% of maximal voluntary clenching. A Vibrameter applied to the right masseter muscle measured perceived intensity of vibration and perceived discomfort, which were assessed on 0-50-100 numeric rating scales. An electronic algometer measured pressure pain threshold (PPT). Two 0- to 100-mm visual analog scales measured pain intensity (VASpain) and fatigue (VASfatigue). Measurements were made on the right masseter muscle. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate test-retest reliability of VT measurements. Outcome variables were tested with two-way ANOVAs for repeated measures and Dunnett's post-hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate long-term (ICC 0.59) and good short-term (ICC 0.92) reliability was found for VT on the masseter muscle. Clenching level had no main effect on perceived intensity of vibration; time effects (P < .05) were only observed at 40 minutes (Dunnett's test: P < .01). Clenching level and time had no effect on perceived discomfort. Only time effects were significant for PPT (P < .01), with reductions at 50 and 60 minutes compared to baseline (Dunnett's test: P < .05). Clenching level and time had main effects for VASpain and VASfatigue (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experimental tooth clenching appears to evoke moderate levels of pain and fatigue and short-lasting hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulation, but not proprioceptive allodynia. The absence of proprioceptive allodynia does not necessarily exclude delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) but warrants further studies on the clinical manifestations of DOMS in jaw muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To (A) evaluate test-retest reliability of vibrotactile sensitivity in the masseter muscle and (B) test if (1) the vibration threshold is decreased after experimental tooth clenching, (2) intense vibrations exacerbate pain after tooth clenching, (3) pain and fatigue are increased after tooth clenching, and (4) pressure pain thresholds are decreased after tooth clenching.

Methods: In part A, 25 healthy female volunteers (mean age: 42 ± 12 years) participated, and 16 healthy females (mean age 32 ± 10 years) participated in three 60-minute sessions, each with 24- and 48-hour follow-ups in part B. Participants were randomly assigned tooth-clenching exercises with clenching levels of 10%, 20%, or 40% of maximal voluntary clenching. A Vibrameter applied to the right masseter muscle measured perceived intensity of vibration and perceived discomfort, which were assessed on 0-50-100 numeric rating scales. An electronic algometer measured pressure pain threshold (PPT). Two 0- to 100-mm visual analog scales measured pain intensity (VASpain) and fatigue (VASfatigue). Measurements were made on the right masseter muscle. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate test-retest reliability of VT measurements. Outcome variables were tested with two-way ANOVAs for repeated measures and Dunnett's post-hoc test.

Results: Moderate long-term (ICC 0.59) and good short-term (ICC 0.92) reliability was found for VT on the masseter muscle. Clenching level had no main effect on perceived intensity of vibration; time effects (P < .05) were only observed at 40 minutes (Dunnett's test: P < .01). Clenching level and time had no effect on perceived discomfort. Only time effects were significant for PPT (P < .01), with reductions at 50 and 60 minutes compared to baseline (Dunnett's test: P < .05). Clenching level and time had main effects for VASpain and VASfatigue (P < .001).

Conclusion: Experimental tooth clenching appears to evoke moderate levels of pain and fatigue and short-lasting hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulation, but not proprioceptive allodynia. The absence of proprioceptive allodynia does not necessarily exclude delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) but warrants further studies on the clinical manifestations of DOMS in jaw muscles.

咬牙练习后本体感觉异常性疼痛的评估。
目的:(A)评估咬肌振动触觉敏感性的重测信度。(B)测试:(1)实验性咬牙后振动阈值降低,(2)强烈振动加剧咬牙后疼痛,(3)咬牙后疼痛和疲劳增加,(4)咬牙后压力痛阈值降低。方法:在A部分,25名健康女性志愿者(平均年龄42±12岁)和16名健康女性志愿者(平均年龄32±10岁)参加了三个60分钟的疗程,在b部分,每个疗程有24小时和48小时的随访。参与者随机分配握紧牙量为最大自愿握紧牙量的10%,20%或40%的握紧牙量。一个振动计应用于右咬肌测量感知振动强度和感知不适感,这是评估0-50-100数值等级。电子测痛仪测量压力痛阈值(PPT)。两个0到100毫米的视觉模拟量表测量疼痛强度(VASpain)和疲劳(VASfatigue)。测量右咬肌。用类间相关系数(Interclass correlation coefficient, ICC)计算VT测量的重测信度。结果变量采用重复测量的双向方差分析和Dunnett事后检验进行检验。结果:咬肌VT长期可靠度中等(ICC 0.59),短期可靠度较好(ICC 0.92)。握紧程度对感知振动强度无主要影响;时间效应仅在40 min时出现(P < 0.05) (Dunnett检验:P < 0.01)。握紧程度和时间对感知到的不适感没有影响。PPT只有时间效应显著(P < 0.01),与基线相比,在50和60分钟时减少(Dunnett试验:P < 0.05)。握紧程度和握紧时间对血管痉挛和血管疲劳有主要影响(P < 0.001)。结论:实验性咬牙对机械刺激可引起中等程度的疼痛、疲劳和短期痛觉过敏,但不会引起本体感觉异常性疼痛。本体感觉异常性疼痛的缺失并不一定排除迟发性肌肉酸痛(DOMS),但值得进一步研究迟发性肌肉酸痛在颌骨肌肉的临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信