Bioequivalence evaluation of 2 tablet formulations of entecavir in healthy chinese volunteers: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label crossover study.

Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research Pub Date : 2012-03-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-20 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1297964
J Jin, J Liu, J Chen, L Zhao, Z Ma, X Chen, M Huang, G Zhong
{"title":"Bioequivalence evaluation of 2 tablet formulations of entecavir in healthy chinese volunteers: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label crossover study.","authors":"J Jin,&nbsp;J Liu,&nbsp;J Chen,&nbsp;L Zhao,&nbsp;Z Ma,&nbsp;X Chen,&nbsp;M Huang,&nbsp;G Zhong","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1297964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized, 2-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of entecavir (CAS 142217-69-4) tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to meet the requirements for marketing the test product in China. Test and reference tablets were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by a 2-week washout period. Blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h following drug administration. Plasma concentration of entecavir was determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental model. Bioequivalence was determined by calculating 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ values for the test and reference products. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs, laboratory tests and interviews with the volunteers before administration and every 2 h during the study. The 90% CIs of entecavir for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 95.2-106.9%, 98.4-104.6% and 97.3-104.4%, respectively, which fell within the interval of 80-125%. No clinically important adverse effects were reported. These results suggested that the test formulation of entecavir tablets met the regulatory criterion for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56084,"journal":{"name":"Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research","volume":"62 3","pages":"113-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1297964","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1297964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A randomized, 2-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of entecavir (CAS 142217-69-4) tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to meet the requirements for marketing the test product in China. Test and reference tablets were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by a 2-week washout period. Blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h following drug administration. Plasma concentration of entecavir was determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental model. Bioequivalence was determined by calculating 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ values for the test and reference products. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs, laboratory tests and interviews with the volunteers before administration and every 2 h during the study. The 90% CIs of entecavir for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 95.2-106.9%, 98.4-104.6% and 97.3-104.4%, respectively, which fell within the interval of 80-125%. No clinically important adverse effects were reported. These results suggested that the test formulation of entecavir tablets met the regulatory criterion for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.

2种恩替卡韦片剂在中国健康志愿者体内的生物等效性评价:单剂量、随机顺序、开放标签交叉研究
为评价恩替卡韦新仿制制剂(CAS 142217-69-4)片(试验)与现有品牌制剂(参考)的生物等效性,以满足试验产品在中国市场的销售要求,在中国健康男性志愿者中开展了一项随机、双向交叉研究。试验片和参考片在2天内以单剂量给药,中间间隔2周洗脱期。给药后24小时采集血样。采用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC/MS/MS)法测定恩替卡韦的血药浓度。采用非室室模型计算药代动力学参数。通过计算被试产品和参比产品的Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞值比值的90% CIs来确定生物等效性。在给药前和研究期间每隔2小时通过监测生命体征、实验室测试和对志愿者的访谈来评估耐受性。恩替卡韦对Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的90% ci分别为95.2-106.9%、98.4-104.6%和97.3-104.4%,均落在80-125%区间内。没有临床重要的不良反应报告。结果表明,恩替卡韦片的试验制剂与参比制剂符合生物等效性标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信