An observational study on cough in children: epidemiology, impact on quality of sleep and treatment outcome.

Francesco De Blasio, Peter V Dicpinigaitis, Bruce K Rubin, Gianluca De Danieli, Luigi Lanata, Alessando Zanasi
{"title":"An observational study on cough in children: epidemiology, impact on quality of sleep and treatment outcome.","authors":"Francesco De Blasio,&nbsp;Peter V Dicpinigaitis,&nbsp;Bruce K Rubin,&nbsp;Gianluca De Danieli,&nbsp;Luigi Lanata,&nbsp;Alessando Zanasi","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-8-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cough is one of the most frequent symptoms in children and is the most common symptom for which children visit a health care provider.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational study on acute cough associated with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) in children. The study evaluates the epidemiology and impact of cough on quality of sleep and children's activities, and the outcome of cough with antitussive treatments in pediatric routine clinical practice. Study assessments were performed through a pediatric cough questionnaire (PCQ), developed by the Italian Society of Cough Study. A total of 433 children visited by family care pediatricians for acute cough due to a URTI were enrolled in this study, with mean age of 6.1 years (SD 3.6). Cough type, duration, severity and frequency, cough impact on sleep disturbances of children and parents and on school and sport activities were assessed at baseline. In a subset of 241 children who were either treated with antitussive drugs (levodropropizine n = 101, central antitussives n = 60) or received no treatment (n = 80), the outcome of cough after 6 days was analyzed in terms of resolution, improvement, no change, or worsening. Descriptive analysis, χ2 test, and multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cough disturbed sleep in 88% of children and 72% of parents. In children treated with cough suppressants, the duration, type, intensity, and frequency cough were similar at baseline in the two groups respectively treated with levodropropizine and central antitussives (cloperastine and codeine). Both levodropropizine and central drugs reduced cough intensity and frequency. However, percentage of cough resolution was higher with levodropropizine than with central antitussives (47% vs. 28% respectively, p = 0.0012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute cough disturbs sleep in most children and their parents. Both levodropropizine and central antitussives reduced cough intensity, with levodropropizine producing a higher cough resolution rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"8 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-8-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-8-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cough is one of the most frequent symptoms in children and is the most common symptom for which children visit a health care provider.

Methods: This is an observational study on acute cough associated with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) in children. The study evaluates the epidemiology and impact of cough on quality of sleep and children's activities, and the outcome of cough with antitussive treatments in pediatric routine clinical practice. Study assessments were performed through a pediatric cough questionnaire (PCQ), developed by the Italian Society of Cough Study. A total of 433 children visited by family care pediatricians for acute cough due to a URTI were enrolled in this study, with mean age of 6.1 years (SD 3.6). Cough type, duration, severity and frequency, cough impact on sleep disturbances of children and parents and on school and sport activities were assessed at baseline. In a subset of 241 children who were either treated with antitussive drugs (levodropropizine n = 101, central antitussives n = 60) or received no treatment (n = 80), the outcome of cough after 6 days was analyzed in terms of resolution, improvement, no change, or worsening. Descriptive analysis, χ2 test, and multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression were performed.

Results: Cough disturbed sleep in 88% of children and 72% of parents. In children treated with cough suppressants, the duration, type, intensity, and frequency cough were similar at baseline in the two groups respectively treated with levodropropizine and central antitussives (cloperastine and codeine). Both levodropropizine and central drugs reduced cough intensity and frequency. However, percentage of cough resolution was higher with levodropropizine than with central antitussives (47% vs. 28% respectively, p = 0.0012).

Conclusions: Acute cough disturbs sleep in most children and their parents. Both levodropropizine and central antitussives reduced cough intensity, with levodropropizine producing a higher cough resolution rate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童咳嗽的观察性研究:流行病学、对睡眠质量的影响及治疗结果。
背景:咳嗽是儿童最常见的症状之一,也是儿童就诊的最常见症状。方法:对儿童急性咳嗽合并上呼吸道感染(URTI)进行观察性研究。本研究旨在探讨小儿咳嗽的流行病学、咳嗽对睡眠质量和儿童活动的影响,以及在小儿常规临床实践中咳嗽与止咳治疗的效果。通过意大利咳嗽研究学会开发的儿科咳嗽问卷(PCQ)进行研究评估。共有433名儿童因泌尿道感染引起的急性咳嗽被家庭护理儿科医生纳入本研究,平均年龄6.1岁(SD 3.6)。在基线时评估咳嗽类型、持续时间、严重程度和频率、咳嗽对儿童和家长睡眠障碍的影响以及对学校和体育活动的影响。在241名接受止咳药物治疗(左丙丙嗪n = 101,中枢止咳药n = 60)或未接受治疗(n = 80)的儿童中,从缓解、改善、无变化或恶化的角度分析6天后的咳嗽结果。采用描述性分析、χ2检验和逐步logistic回归的多因素分析。结果:咳嗽影响睡眠的患儿占88%,家长占72%。在使用止咳药治疗的儿童中,两组分别使用左旋丙哌嗪和中枢止咳药(氯培司汀和可待因)治疗的持续时间、类型、强度和频率在基线时相似。左旋丙哌嗪和中枢药物均可降低咳嗽强度和频率。然而,左丙丙嗪组咳嗽缓解率高于中枢止咳药组(分别为47%对28%,p = 0.0012)。结论:急性咳嗽影响儿童及其家长的睡眠。左旋丙哌嗪和中枢止咳药均可降低咳嗽强度,其中左旋丙哌嗪产生更高的咳嗽解析率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信