[Acceptability of implementation of mutual health in a Senegalese rural area].

A Faye, C T Diop, P Ndiaye, A Tal-Dia
{"title":"[Acceptability of implementation of mutual health in a Senegalese rural area].","authors":"A Faye,&nbsp;C T Diop,&nbsp;P Ndiaye,&nbsp;A Tal-Dia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Funding for healthcare poses a major problem in developing countries. The purpose of this study was to assess public perceptions toward the implementation of mutual healthcare coverage in rural Senegal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive transversal study was conducted from 24/09/07 to 05/10/07 in a randomly selected sample of 208 heads of households living in the rural communities of Ngogom and Réfane. Data were collected by means of individual interviews and focus group discussions. Topics included population health, community solidarity, health insurance and implementation of mutual healthcare insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample population was 94% male, 91% married, 36% uneducated and 11% unemployed. Household income was irregular in 36% and 84% had no savings. In case of medical emergency, 43% relied on family for assistance, 36% had no recourse and 21% would have to contract, a loan. Nearly half the sample population, i.e., 46%, were familiar with the principle of mutual healthcare insurance and 98% wanted to join. The main reasons for wanting to join were to reduce medical costs (57%), improve access to care (25%) and build community solidarity (11%). In focus groups, people expressed the need for micro health insurance. Findings also showed good community dynamics and a tradition of pooling resources to implement collective activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The public perception of mutual healthcare insurance is favorable. However, due to economic difficulties, support from political and health authorities will be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18423,"journal":{"name":"Medecine tropicale : revue du Corps de sante colonial","volume":"71 5","pages":"508-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine tropicale : revue du Corps de sante colonial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Funding for healthcare poses a major problem in developing countries. The purpose of this study was to assess public perceptions toward the implementation of mutual healthcare coverage in rural Senegal.

Methods: A descriptive transversal study was conducted from 24/09/07 to 05/10/07 in a randomly selected sample of 208 heads of households living in the rural communities of Ngogom and Réfane. Data were collected by means of individual interviews and focus group discussions. Topics included population health, community solidarity, health insurance and implementation of mutual healthcare insurance.

Results: The sample population was 94% male, 91% married, 36% uneducated and 11% unemployed. Household income was irregular in 36% and 84% had no savings. In case of medical emergency, 43% relied on family for assistance, 36% had no recourse and 21% would have to contract, a loan. Nearly half the sample population, i.e., 46%, were familiar with the principle of mutual healthcare insurance and 98% wanted to join. The main reasons for wanting to join were to reduce medical costs (57%), improve access to care (25%) and build community solidarity (11%). In focus groups, people expressed the need for micro health insurance. Findings also showed good community dynamics and a tradition of pooling resources to implement collective activities.

Conclusion: The public perception of mutual healthcare insurance is favorable. However, due to economic difficulties, support from political and health authorities will be needed.

[在塞内加尔农村地区实施相互保健的可接受性]。
未标记:卫生保健的资金是发展中国家的一个主要问题。本研究的目的是评估公众对在塞内加尔农村实施相互医疗保险的看法。方法:从2007年9月24日至2007年10月5日,对随机选择的Ngogom和rsamfane农村社区的208名户主进行了描述性横向研究。通过个人访谈和焦点小组讨论的方式收集数据。主题包括人口健康、社区团结、健康保险和相互医疗保险的实施。结果:样本人口中男性占94%,已婚占91%,未受教育占36%,失业占11%。36%的人家庭收入不稳定,84%的人没有储蓄。在医疗紧急情况下,43%的人依靠家人的帮助,36%的人没有追索权,21%的人必须签订贷款合同。近一半的样本人口,即46%,熟悉互助医疗保险的原则,98%的人想要加入。想要加入的主要原因是降低医疗费用(57%),改善获得护理的机会(25%)和建立社区团结(11%)。在焦点小组中,人们表示需要小额医疗保险。调查结果还显示出良好的社区活力和集中资源执行集体活动的传统。结论:公众对互助医疗保险的认知是良好的。然而,由于经济困难,将需要政治和卫生当局的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信