Emília de Faria Oliveira, Suelly Cecilia Olivan Limongi
{"title":"Quality of life of parents/caregivers of children and adolescents with Down syndrome.","authors":"Emília de Faria Oliveira, Suelly Cecilia Olivan Limongi","doi":"10.1590/s2179-64912011000400006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the quality of life (LQ) of parents/caregivers of children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS), as well as the influence of socio-demographic aspects on the results obtained.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 31 parents/caregivers of children and adolescents with DS, divided into three groups: G1, caregivers of ten preschoolers (ages between 1 year and 5 years and 11 months); G2, caregivers of 11 school-aged children (ages between 6 years and 10 years and 11 months); and, G3, caregivers of ten pre-teens and adolescents (ages between 11 years and 15 years and 11 months). Parents/caregivers characterization: most of them were between 40 and 49 years old; high-school was the most common education level, followed by incomplete elementary school and college education; concerning the socio-economic class, most of them were from classes C and B2. The QL WHOQOL- bref protocol was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four percent of the parents/caregivers rated their QL as \"good\", and 55% reported to be \"satisfied\" with their health. The lowest average score was found for the Environment domain, which was found to be correlated with socio-demographic variables \"education degree\" and \"socio-economic level\". No difference was found between groups when age ranges were compared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the studied population consider their QL as \"good\", and is \"satisfied\" with their health. The Environment domain and the socio-demographic variables \"education degree\" and \"socio-economic level\" are the aspects that influence their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":89403,"journal":{"name":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","volume":"23 4","pages":"321-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s2179-64912011000400006","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-64912011000400006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the quality of life (LQ) of parents/caregivers of children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS), as well as the influence of socio-demographic aspects on the results obtained.
Methods: Participants were 31 parents/caregivers of children and adolescents with DS, divided into three groups: G1, caregivers of ten preschoolers (ages between 1 year and 5 years and 11 months); G2, caregivers of 11 school-aged children (ages between 6 years and 10 years and 11 months); and, G3, caregivers of ten pre-teens and adolescents (ages between 11 years and 15 years and 11 months). Parents/caregivers characterization: most of them were between 40 and 49 years old; high-school was the most common education level, followed by incomplete elementary school and college education; concerning the socio-economic class, most of them were from classes C and B2. The QL WHOQOL- bref protocol was administered.
Results: Eighty-four percent of the parents/caregivers rated their QL as "good", and 55% reported to be "satisfied" with their health. The lowest average score was found for the Environment domain, which was found to be correlated with socio-demographic variables "education degree" and "socio-economic level". No difference was found between groups when age ranges were compared.
Conclusion: The results suggest that the studied population consider their QL as "good", and is "satisfied" with their health. The Environment domain and the socio-demographic variables "education degree" and "socio-economic level" are the aspects that influence their quality of life.