How to Group Genes according to Expression Profiles?

International journal of plant genomics Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-12-20 DOI:10.1155/2011/261975
Julio A Di Rienzo, Silvia G Valdano, Paula Fernández
{"title":"How to Group Genes according to Expression Profiles?","authors":"Julio A Di Rienzo,&nbsp;Silvia G Valdano,&nbsp;Paula Fernández","doi":"10.1155/2011/261975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most commonly applied strategies for identifying genes with a common response profile are based on clustering algorithms. These methods have no explicit rules to define the appropriate number of groups of genes. Usually the number of clusters is decided on heuristic criteria or through the application of different methods proposed to assess the number of clusters in a data set. The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of seven of these techniques, including traditional ones, and some recently proposed. All of them produce underestimations of the true number of clusters. However, within this limitation, the gDGC algorithm appears to be the best. It is the only one that explicitly states a rule for cutting a dendrogram on the basis of a testing hypothesis framework, allowing the user to calibrate the sensitivity, adjusting the significance level.</p>","PeriodicalId":73471,"journal":{"name":"International journal of plant genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2011/261975","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of plant genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/261975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The most commonly applied strategies for identifying genes with a common response profile are based on clustering algorithms. These methods have no explicit rules to define the appropriate number of groups of genes. Usually the number of clusters is decided on heuristic criteria or through the application of different methods proposed to assess the number of clusters in a data set. The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of seven of these techniques, including traditional ones, and some recently proposed. All of them produce underestimations of the true number of clusters. However, within this limitation, the gDGC algorithm appears to be the best. It is the only one that explicitly states a rule for cutting a dendrogram on the basis of a testing hypothesis framework, allowing the user to calibrate the sensitivity, adjusting the significance level.

Abstract Image

如何根据表达谱对基因进行分组?
识别具有共同反应谱的基因最常用的策略是基于聚类算法。这些方法没有明确的规则来定义适当数量的基因组。通常,聚类的数量是由启发式标准决定的,或者通过应用不同的方法来评估数据集中的聚类数量。本文的目的是比较其中七种技术的性能,包括传统技术和最近提出的一些技术。所有这些都低估了集群的真实数量。然而,在这个限制下,gDGC算法似乎是最好的。它是唯一一个明确规定了在测试假设框架的基础上切割树形图的规则,允许用户校准灵敏度,调整显著性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信