{"title":"Jane Austen on love and pedagogical power.","authors":"Patrick Fessenbecker","doi":"10.1353/sel.2011.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay notes initially recent prominence of theories of pedagogy that attempt to \"de-mystify\" it and reveal troubling power relations, and their subsequent contention that love is impossible in the student-teacher relationship. \"Pedagogical\" interpretations of Jane Austen's fiction, however, see pedagogy as essential to love. I argue that this is so precisely because of the power dynamics involved; drawing on Jessica Benjamin's psychoanalytic interpretation of G. W. F. Hegel's analysis of the \"Lord-Bondsman,\" I suggest that Austen portrays the loving relationship as inherently involving the occupation and subsequent exchange of roles as superior and inferior, incarnated as \"teacher\" and \"student.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":82839,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English literature","volume":"51 4","pages":"747-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sel.2011.0038","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2011.0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This essay notes initially recent prominence of theories of pedagogy that attempt to "de-mystify" it and reveal troubling power relations, and their subsequent contention that love is impossible in the student-teacher relationship. "Pedagogical" interpretations of Jane Austen's fiction, however, see pedagogy as essential to love. I argue that this is so precisely because of the power dynamics involved; drawing on Jessica Benjamin's psychoanalytic interpretation of G. W. F. Hegel's analysis of the "Lord-Bondsman," I suggest that Austen portrays the loving relationship as inherently involving the occupation and subsequent exchange of roles as superior and inferior, incarnated as "teacher" and "student."
本文首先注意到最近教育学理论的突出,这些理论试图“去神秘化”它,揭示令人不安的权力关系,以及他们随后的争论,即爱在师生关系中是不可能的。然而,对简·奥斯汀小说的“教育学”解读认为,教育学对爱情至关重要。我认为,这正是因为其中涉及的权力动态;根据杰西卡·本杰明(Jessica Benjamin)对黑格尔(G. W. F. Hegel)对“领主-奴仆”(Lord-Bondsman)的分析所作的精神分析,我认为奥斯汀将爱情关系描绘为固有的,包括职业和随后的上级和下级角色互换,化身为“老师”和“学生”。