Comparison of CD63 Upregulation Induced by NSAIDs on Basophils and Monocytes in Patients with NSAID Hypersensitivity.

Journal of allergy Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-12-01 DOI:10.1155/2012/580873
N Abuaf, H Rostane, J Barbara, C Toly-Ndour, H Gaouar, P Mathelier-Fusade, F Leynadier, C Francès, R Girot
{"title":"Comparison of CD63 Upregulation Induced by NSAIDs on Basophils and Monocytes in Patients with NSAID Hypersensitivity.","authors":"N Abuaf,&nbsp;H Rostane,&nbsp;J Barbara,&nbsp;C Toly-Ndour,&nbsp;H Gaouar,&nbsp;P Mathelier-Fusade,&nbsp;F Leynadier,&nbsp;C Francès,&nbsp;R Girot","doi":"10.1155/2012/580873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. An in vitro basophil activation test, based on the detection of CD63 upregulation induced by NSAIDs, has been described. Its clinical significance remains controversial. Objectives. In patients with a history of nonallergic NSAID hypersensitivity, stratified according to the severity of the symptoms, to assess with NSAIDs the predictive value of basophil (BAT) and monocyte (MAT) activation tests. Patients/Methods. Sixty patients who had NSAIDs-induced or exacerbated urticaria/angiooedema and 20 controls was included. After incubation with NSAIDs or acetaminophen, leukocytes were analysed for CD63 upregulation. Results. With aspirin, the sensitivity (37%) and specificity (90%) of BAT agree with already published results. In contrast, when patients had had cutaneous and visceral reactions, the frequency of positive BAT 14/22 (64%, P < 0.001) or MAT 10/22 (46%, P < 0.01) were increased. Conclusions. Positive tests were more frequent among patients having a severe hypersensitivity contrasting with the other patients who had results similar to controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":88910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of allergy","volume":"2012 ","pages":"580873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/580873","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/580873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Background. An in vitro basophil activation test, based on the detection of CD63 upregulation induced by NSAIDs, has been described. Its clinical significance remains controversial. Objectives. In patients with a history of nonallergic NSAID hypersensitivity, stratified according to the severity of the symptoms, to assess with NSAIDs the predictive value of basophil (BAT) and monocyte (MAT) activation tests. Patients/Methods. Sixty patients who had NSAIDs-induced or exacerbated urticaria/angiooedema and 20 controls was included. After incubation with NSAIDs or acetaminophen, leukocytes were analysed for CD63 upregulation. Results. With aspirin, the sensitivity (37%) and specificity (90%) of BAT agree with already published results. In contrast, when patients had had cutaneous and visceral reactions, the frequency of positive BAT 14/22 (64%, P < 0.001) or MAT 10/22 (46%, P < 0.01) were increased. Conclusions. Positive tests were more frequent among patients having a severe hypersensitivity contrasting with the other patients who had results similar to controls.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非甾体抗炎药对非甾体抗炎药过敏患者嗜碱性粒细胞和单核细胞CD63表达上调的比较
背景。体外嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验,基于检测CD63上调诱导的非甾体抗炎药,已经描述。其临床意义仍有争议。目标。在有非过敏性非甾体抗炎药超敏反应史的患者中,根据症状的严重程度分层,用非甾体抗炎药评估嗜碱性粒细胞(BAT)和单核细胞(MAT)激活试验的预测价值。病人/方法。60例非甾体抗炎药引起或加重的荨麻疹/血管水肿患者和20例对照组纳入研究。用非甾体抗炎药或对乙酰氨基酚孵育后,分析白细胞CD63的上调。结果。对于阿司匹林,BAT的敏感性(37%)和特异性(90%)与已发表的结果一致。相比之下,当患者有皮肤和内脏反应时,BAT 14/22阳性(64%,P < 0.001)或MAT 10/22阳性(46%,P < 0.01)的频率增加。结论。与其他结果与对照组相似的患者相比,严重超敏反应患者的阳性检测更为频繁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信