Validation of a modified table to map the 1998 Abbreviated Injury Scale to the 2008 scale and the use of adjusted severities.

Hideo Tohira, Ian Jacobs, David Mountain, Nick Gibson, Allen Yeo, Masato Ueno, Hiroaki Watanabe
{"title":"Validation of a modified table to map the 1998 Abbreviated Injury Scale to the 2008 scale and the use of adjusted severities.","authors":"Hideo Tohira,&nbsp;Ian Jacobs,&nbsp;David Mountain,&nbsp;Nick Gibson,&nbsp;Allen Yeo,&nbsp;Masato Ueno,&nbsp;Hiroaki Watanabe","doi":"10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2008 (AIS 2008) is the most recent injury coding system. A mapping table from a previous AIS 98 to AIS 2008 is available. However, AIS 98 codes that are unmappable to AIS 2008 codes exist in this table. Furthermore, some AIS 98 codes can be mapped to multiple candidate AIS 2008 codes with different severities. We aimed to modify the original table to adjust the severities and to validate these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modified the original table by adding links from unmappable AIS 98 codes to AIS 2008 codes. We applied the original table and our modified table to AIS 98 codes for major trauma patients. We also assigned candidate codes with different severities the weighted averages of their severities as an adjusted severity. The proportion of cases whose injury severity scores (ISSs) were computable were compared. We also compared the agreement of the ISS and New ISS (NISS) between manually determined AIS 2008 codes (MAN) and mapped codes by using our table (MAP) with unadjusted or adjusted severities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All and 72.3% of cases had their ISSs computed by our modified table and the original table, respectively. The agreement between MAN and MAP with respect to the ISS and NISS was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.939 for ISS and 0.943 for NISS). Using adjusted severities, the agreements of the ISS and NISS improved to 0.953 (p = 0.11) and 0.963 (p = 0.007), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our modified mapping table seems to allow more ISSs to be computed than the original table. Severity scores exhibited substantial agreement between MAN and MAP. The use of adjusted severities improved these agreements further.</p>","PeriodicalId":48894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2008 (AIS 2008) is the most recent injury coding system. A mapping table from a previous AIS 98 to AIS 2008 is available. However, AIS 98 codes that are unmappable to AIS 2008 codes exist in this table. Furthermore, some AIS 98 codes can be mapped to multiple candidate AIS 2008 codes with different severities. We aimed to modify the original table to adjust the severities and to validate these changes.

Methods: We modified the original table by adding links from unmappable AIS 98 codes to AIS 2008 codes. We applied the original table and our modified table to AIS 98 codes for major trauma patients. We also assigned candidate codes with different severities the weighted averages of their severities as an adjusted severity. The proportion of cases whose injury severity scores (ISSs) were computable were compared. We also compared the agreement of the ISS and New ISS (NISS) between manually determined AIS 2008 codes (MAN) and mapped codes by using our table (MAP) with unadjusted or adjusted severities.

Results: All and 72.3% of cases had their ISSs computed by our modified table and the original table, respectively. The agreement between MAN and MAP with respect to the ISS and NISS was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.939 for ISS and 0.943 for NISS). Using adjusted severities, the agreements of the ISS and NISS improved to 0.953 (p = 0.11) and 0.963 (p = 0.007), respectively.

Conclusion: Our modified mapping table seems to allow more ISSs to be computed than the original table. Severity scores exhibited substantial agreement between MAN and MAP. The use of adjusted severities improved these agreements further.

将1998年简略伤害量表与2008年简略伤害量表相对应的修改表的有效性,以及调整严重程度的使用。
背景:简易伤害量表2008 (AIS 2008)是最新的伤害编码系统。从以前的AIS 98到AIS 2008的映射表是可用的。但是,该表中存在不能与AIS 2008代码映射的AIS 98代码。此外,一些AIS 98码可以映射到多个不同严重程度的AIS 2008候选码。我们的目标是修改原始表以调整严重性并验证这些更改。方法:对原表进行修改,将无法映射的AIS 98编码与AIS 2008编码进行链接。我们将原始表格和修改后的表格应用于重大创伤患者的AIS 98编码。我们还分配了不同严重程度的候选代码,将其严重程度的加权平均值作为调整后的严重程度。比较可计算损伤严重程度评分(ISSs)的病例比例。我们还比较了人工确定的AIS 2008代码(MAN)与使用我们的表(MAP)绘制的代码在未调整或调整严重程度下的国际标准和新国际标准(NISS)之间的一致性。结果:所有病例和72.3%的病例分别用我们的修改表和原表计算了ISSs。MAN和MAP在ISS和NISS方面的一致性很强(ISS的类内相关系数为0.939,NISS的类内相关系数为0.943)。使用调整后的严重程度,ISS和NISS的一致性分别提高到0.953 (p = 0.11)和0.963 (p = 0.007)。结论:我们修改的映射表似乎比原始表允许计算更多的iss。严重程度评分在MAN和MAP之间显示出实质性的一致。调整严重性的使用进一步改善了这些协定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-EMERGENCY MEDICINE
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信