Minimal aortic injury after blunt trauma: selective nonoperative management is safe.

Jasmeet S Paul, Todd Neideen, Sean Tutton, David Milia, Parag Tolat, Dennis Foley, Karen Brasel
{"title":"Minimal aortic injury after blunt trauma: selective nonoperative management is safe.","authors":"Jasmeet S Paul,&nbsp;Todd Neideen,&nbsp;Sean Tutton,&nbsp;David Milia,&nbsp;Parag Tolat,&nbsp;Dennis Foley,&nbsp;Karen Brasel","doi":"10.1097/TA.0b013e31823b9811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of minimal aortic injuries (MAIs) are being identified with modern computed tomography (CT) imaging techniques. The optimal management and natural history of these injuries are unknown. We have adopted a policy of selective multidisciplinary nonoperative management of MAI. This study examines our experience with these patients from July 2004 to June 2009.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of all blunt trauma patients who underwent chest CT angiography to evaluate for blunt aortic injury (BAI) was undertaken. All patients deemed to have a MAI were managed nonoperatively, and those with a severe aortic injury underwent repair. Data collected included age, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, type and location of aortic injury, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), overall LOS, ventilator days, disposition, and mortality. In addition, all BAIs were graded according to the Presley Trauma Center CT Grading System of Aortic Injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients with BAI were identified. Thirty-two were classified as severe injuries, and 15 were considered MAI (32%). Nineteen underwent operative repair, 13 underwent endovascular stent graft repair, and 15 were managed nonoperatively. The average Injury Severity Score was 31 ± 10, and the average age was 44 ± 20 with no significant difference across treatment groups. There was no difference in overall or intensive care unit LOS. The nonoperative group had a shorter duration of ventilator days (1.1 vs. 4.28, p = 0.02). There were five deaths, none in the nonoperative group. None of these patients required subsequent intervention. All nonoperative patients had follow-up imaging at median of 4 days; on CT chest angiography, five injuries had resolved, eight had stable intimal flaps or pseudoaneurysm, and two had no detectable injury on subsequent aortogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost one-third of our BAI were safely managed nonoperatively. Patients with MAI should be considered for selective nonoperative management in a multidisciplinary approach with close radiographic follow-up. We recommend that patients with MAIs should be considered for selective nonoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823b9811","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823b9811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of minimal aortic injuries (MAIs) are being identified with modern computed tomography (CT) imaging techniques. The optimal management and natural history of these injuries are unknown. We have adopted a policy of selective multidisciplinary nonoperative management of MAI. This study examines our experience with these patients from July 2004 to June 2009.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of all blunt trauma patients who underwent chest CT angiography to evaluate for blunt aortic injury (BAI) was undertaken. All patients deemed to have a MAI were managed nonoperatively, and those with a severe aortic injury underwent repair. Data collected included age, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, type and location of aortic injury, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), overall LOS, ventilator days, disposition, and mortality. In addition, all BAIs were graded according to the Presley Trauma Center CT Grading System of Aortic Injury.

Results: Forty-seven patients with BAI were identified. Thirty-two were classified as severe injuries, and 15 were considered MAI (32%). Nineteen underwent operative repair, 13 underwent endovascular stent graft repair, and 15 were managed nonoperatively. The average Injury Severity Score was 31 ± 10, and the average age was 44 ± 20 with no significant difference across treatment groups. There was no difference in overall or intensive care unit LOS. The nonoperative group had a shorter duration of ventilator days (1.1 vs. 4.28, p = 0.02). There were five deaths, none in the nonoperative group. None of these patients required subsequent intervention. All nonoperative patients had follow-up imaging at median of 4 days; on CT chest angiography, five injuries had resolved, eight had stable intimal flaps or pseudoaneurysm, and two had no detectable injury on subsequent aortogram.

Conclusion: Almost one-third of our BAI were safely managed nonoperatively. Patients with MAI should be considered for selective nonoperative management in a multidisciplinary approach with close radiographic follow-up. We recommend that patients with MAIs should be considered for selective nonoperative management.

钝性创伤后主动脉损伤最小:选择性非手术治疗是安全的。
背景:越来越多的小主动脉损伤(MAIs)被现代计算机断层扫描(CT)成像技术所识别。这些损伤的最佳处理方法和自然病史尚不清楚。我们采取了选择性多学科非手术治疗MAI的政策。本研究考察了我们从2004年7月到2009年6月对这些患者的治疗经验。方法:对所有行胸部CT血管造影评估钝性主动脉损伤(BAI)的钝性创伤患者进行回顾性分析。所有被认为有MAI的患者都进行了非手术治疗,那些主动脉严重损伤的患者进行了修复。收集的数据包括年龄、损伤机制、损伤严重程度评分、主动脉损伤类型和部位、重症监护病房住院时间(LOS)、总LOS、呼吸机天数、处置和死亡率。此外,所有BAIs均按照Presley创伤中心主动脉损伤CT分级系统进行分级。结果:确定了47例BAI患者。32例为严重损伤,15例为MAI(32%)。19例行手术修复,13例行血管内支架修复,15例行非手术治疗。损伤严重程度评分(Injury Severity Score)平均为31±10分,平均年龄为44±20岁,两组间差异无统计学意义。总体或重症监护病房的LOS没有差异。非手术组呼吸机使用天数较短(1.1 vs 4.28, p = 0.02)。有5例死亡,非手术组无一例。这些患者均不需要后续干预。所有非手术患者随访时间中位数为4天;CT胸部血管造影显示,5例损伤消退,8例有稳定的内膜瓣或假性动脉瘤,2例在随后的主动脉造影中未发现损伤。结论:近三分之一的BAI采用非手术安全处理。MAI患者应考虑在多学科的方法中选择非手术治疗,并进行密切的影像学随访。我们建议MAIs患者应考虑选择性非手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-EMERGENCY MEDICINE
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信