Lost in translation: the Canadian access to medicines regime from transnational activism to domestic implementation.

Health law journal Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Tania Bubela, Jean-Frederic Morin
{"title":"Lost in translation: the Canadian access to medicines regime from transnational activism to domestic implementation.","authors":"Tania Bubela,&nbsp;Jean-Frederic Morin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canada was the first country to implement the WTO Decision of August 30, 2003, authorizing the export of generic drugs manufactured under a compulsory license to developing countries in response to a proposal brought forward by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that now claim dissatisfaction with the Canadian legislation. This empirical case study examines what success means for an NGO campaign. It contrasts interviews, documents, media coverage, and public statements of stakeholders, using quantitative and qualitative analyses. It concludes the NGO network experienced a shift from a mobilizer of public sentiment at the international level to a policy adviser at the domestic level. This shift crystallized a change in leadership toward local, rather than transnational NGOs, and a shift in strategy from being radical to more reformist. While this process of institutionalizing the outcomes of international campaigns is necessary for the implementation of international norms into domestic policy, it required NGOs to compromise their ideal positions, producing some objective successes in legislative reform but subjective dissatisfaction of the NGOs in the failure of Canada's domestic regime to enhance access to medicines on the ground in developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":79926,"journal":{"name":"Health law journal","volume":"18 ","pages":"113-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canada was the first country to implement the WTO Decision of August 30, 2003, authorizing the export of generic drugs manufactured under a compulsory license to developing countries in response to a proposal brought forward by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that now claim dissatisfaction with the Canadian legislation. This empirical case study examines what success means for an NGO campaign. It contrasts interviews, documents, media coverage, and public statements of stakeholders, using quantitative and qualitative analyses. It concludes the NGO network experienced a shift from a mobilizer of public sentiment at the international level to a policy adviser at the domestic level. This shift crystallized a change in leadership toward local, rather than transnational NGOs, and a shift in strategy from being radical to more reformist. While this process of institutionalizing the outcomes of international campaigns is necessary for the implementation of international norms into domestic policy, it required NGOs to compromise their ideal positions, producing some objective successes in legislative reform but subjective dissatisfaction of the NGOs in the failure of Canada's domestic regime to enhance access to medicines on the ground in developing countries.

迷失在翻译中:加拿大药品获取制度从跨国行动主义到国内实施。
加拿大是第一个执行世贸组织2003年8月30日决定的国家,该决定授权向发展中国家出口在强制许可下生产的仿制药,以回应非政府组织提出的一项建议,这些非政府组织现在声称对加拿大的立法感到不满。本实证案例研究考察了NGO运动的成功意义。它使用定量和定性分析对比了访谈、文件、媒体报道和利益相关者的公开声明。文章的结论是,NGO网络经历了从国际层面的民意动员者到国内层面的政策顾问的转变。这一转变明确地表明,领导层转向了本地非政府组织,而不是跨国非政府组织,战略也从激进转向了更具改革性。虽然将国际运动的成果制度化的过程对于将国际规范纳入国内政策是必要的,但它要求非政府组织妥协其理想立场,在立法改革方面取得了一些客观上的成功,但非政府组织对加拿大国内制度未能在发展中国家提高药品可及性的主观不满。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信