{"title":"[Endobronchial ultrasonic-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for lung cancer diagnosis].","authors":"Masaru Nishitsuji, Kenta Yamamura, Hiroki Matsuoka, Yuichi Tanbo, Yoshiki Demura, Koichi Nishi, Masaki Fujimura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although bronchoscopy has an important role in the diagnosis of lung cancer, more invasive procedures, such as CT-guided biopsy or surgery, are needed when transbronchial approaches fail.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonic-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for lung cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 122 cases who were finally diagnosed to have lung cancer from among 388 cases who underwent bronchoscopy because of abnormal shadows on their chest X-ray or CT. When bronchoscopic approaches were possible, conventional transbronchial lung biopsy or cytology (conventional approaches) were done. EBUS-TBNA was added whenever mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes enlarged to more than 1 cm in diameter, or if there were lesions attached to the lower respiratory tract. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional approaches and EBUS-TBNA were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of cases diagnosed as lung cancer by conventional approaches was 79 cases (64.8%) among the 122 cases examined. Of the 43 cases undiagnosed by these procedures, 27 cases were diagnosed as lung cancer by EBUS-TBNA. Thus, 106 cases (86.9%) were diagnosed as lung cancer using conventional approaches plus EBUS-TBNA. No severe complications were observed in all the subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBUS-TBNA is a safe and useful approach for the diagnosis of lung cancer together with staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":19218,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society","volume":"49 10","pages":"729-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although bronchoscopy has an important role in the diagnosis of lung cancer, more invasive procedures, such as CT-guided biopsy or surgery, are needed when transbronchial approaches fail.
Objective: We investigated the usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonic-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for lung cancer diagnosis.
Subjects and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 122 cases who were finally diagnosed to have lung cancer from among 388 cases who underwent bronchoscopy because of abnormal shadows on their chest X-ray or CT. When bronchoscopic approaches were possible, conventional transbronchial lung biopsy or cytology (conventional approaches) were done. EBUS-TBNA was added whenever mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes enlarged to more than 1 cm in diameter, or if there were lesions attached to the lower respiratory tract. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional approaches and EBUS-TBNA were assessed.
Results: The number of cases diagnosed as lung cancer by conventional approaches was 79 cases (64.8%) among the 122 cases examined. Of the 43 cases undiagnosed by these procedures, 27 cases were diagnosed as lung cancer by EBUS-TBNA. Thus, 106 cases (86.9%) were diagnosed as lung cancer using conventional approaches plus EBUS-TBNA. No severe complications were observed in all the subjects.
Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA is a safe and useful approach for the diagnosis of lung cancer together with staging.