[A clinical review of pleurodesis for patients with poor performance status].

Katsutoshi Ando, Yoshihiro Ohkuni, Hideki Makino, Akina Komatsu, Ryo Matsunuma, Kei Nakashima, Nobuhiro Asai, Norihiro Kaneko
{"title":"[A clinical review of pleurodesis for patients with poor performance status].","authors":"Katsutoshi Ando,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Ohkuni,&nbsp;Hideki Makino,&nbsp;Akina Komatsu,&nbsp;Ryo Matsunuma,&nbsp;Kei Nakashima,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Asai,&nbsp;Norihiro Kaneko","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although pleurodesis is an effective treatment for malignant pleural effusion, we hesitate to use in patients with poor performance status (PS) because of its side effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 46 pleurodesis cases in our institution between 2006 and 2010, 24 poor PS cases (>3) were classified into 2 groups according to survival (beyond 3 months) or non-survival, and 3 groups according to condition: PS improved after pleurodesis, remained stable, or was exacerbated and we analyzed their backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 24 cases (66.7%), there were 5 and 19 survival and non-survival cases. Patient backgrounds, characteristics of the lesions and examination results did not differ significantly among them. On the other hand, the ratio of successful initial pleurodesis in the exacerbated PS group was lower than in the improved and stable groups (16.7% vs. 100%, 87.5%). The 1- and 3-month survival rates of unsuccessful cases were lower than those of successful cases (33.3% vs. 77.8%, 0% vs. 32.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Success of initial pleurodesis can affect PS and outcome, thus it is important to improve the number of successful cases of initial pleurodesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19218,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society","volume":"49 10","pages":"723-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although pleurodesis is an effective treatment for malignant pleural effusion, we hesitate to use in patients with poor performance status (PS) because of its side effects.

Methods: Of 46 pleurodesis cases in our institution between 2006 and 2010, 24 poor PS cases (>3) were classified into 2 groups according to survival (beyond 3 months) or non-survival, and 3 groups according to condition: PS improved after pleurodesis, remained stable, or was exacerbated and we analyzed their backgrounds.

Results: Among the 24 cases (66.7%), there were 5 and 19 survival and non-survival cases. Patient backgrounds, characteristics of the lesions and examination results did not differ significantly among them. On the other hand, the ratio of successful initial pleurodesis in the exacerbated PS group was lower than in the improved and stable groups (16.7% vs. 100%, 87.5%). The 1- and 3-month survival rates of unsuccessful cases were lower than those of successful cases (33.3% vs. 77.8%, 0% vs. 32.4%).

Conclusion: Success of initial pleurodesis can affect PS and outcome, thus it is important to improve the number of successful cases of initial pleurodesis.

[表现不佳的患者胸膜切除术的临床回顾]。
背景:虽然胸膜截留术是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效方法,但由于其副作用,我们不愿将其用于表现不佳的患者。方法:对我院2006 ~ 2010年收治的46例胸膜切除术患者中,24例(>3)不良PS按生存期(3个月以上)和无生存期分为2组,按胸膜切除术后PS改善、稳定、加重分为3组,并分析其背景。结果:24例患者中生存和非生存5例,占66.7%。患者背景、病变特征及检查结果无明显差异。另一方面,PS加重组的初始胸膜固定术成功率低于改善和稳定组(16.7%比100%,87.5%)。不成功患者1、3个月生存率低于成功患者(33.3% vs 77.8%, 0% vs 32.4%)。结论:初始胸膜穿心术的成功与否直接影响胸膜穿心术的PS和预后,因此提高初始胸膜穿心术的成功率是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信