Vascular Protection Following Cerebral Ischemia and Reperfusion.

Sara Morales Palomares, Marilyn J Cipolla
{"title":"Vascular Protection Following Cerebral Ischemia and Reperfusion.","authors":"Sara Morales Palomares,&nbsp;Marilyn J Cipolla","doi":"10.4172/2155-9562.s1-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite considerable research that has contributed to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of stroke, translation of this knowledge into effective therapies has largely failed. The only effective treatment for ischemic stroke is rapid recanalization of an occluded vessel by dissolving the clot with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). However, stroke adversely affects vascular function as well that can cause secondary brain injury and limit treatment that depends on a patent vasculature. In middle cerebral arteries (MCA), ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) cause loss of myogenic tone, vascular paralysis, and endothelial dysfunction that can lead to loss of autoregulation. In contrast, brain parenchymal arterioles retain considerable tone during I/R that likely contributes to expansion of the infarct into the penumbra. Microvascular dysregulation also occurs during ischemic stroke that causes edema and hemorrhage, exacerbating the primary insult. Ischemic injury of vasculature is progressive with longer duration of I/R. Early postischemic reperfusion has beneficial effects on stroke outcome but can impair vascular function and exacerbate ischemic injury after longer durations of I/R. This review focuses on current knowledge on the effects of I/R on the structure and function of different vascular segments in the brain and highlight some of the more promising targets for vascular protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurology & neurophysiology","volume":"2011 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216640/pdf/nihms322323.pdf","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurology & neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.s1-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

Despite considerable research that has contributed to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of stroke, translation of this knowledge into effective therapies has largely failed. The only effective treatment for ischemic stroke is rapid recanalization of an occluded vessel by dissolving the clot with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). However, stroke adversely affects vascular function as well that can cause secondary brain injury and limit treatment that depends on a patent vasculature. In middle cerebral arteries (MCA), ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) cause loss of myogenic tone, vascular paralysis, and endothelial dysfunction that can lead to loss of autoregulation. In contrast, brain parenchymal arterioles retain considerable tone during I/R that likely contributes to expansion of the infarct into the penumbra. Microvascular dysregulation also occurs during ischemic stroke that causes edema and hemorrhage, exacerbating the primary insult. Ischemic injury of vasculature is progressive with longer duration of I/R. Early postischemic reperfusion has beneficial effects on stroke outcome but can impair vascular function and exacerbate ischemic injury after longer durations of I/R. This review focuses on current knowledge on the effects of I/R on the structure and function of different vascular segments in the brain and highlight some of the more promising targets for vascular protection.

Abstract Image

脑缺血再灌注后的血管保护。
尽管大量的研究有助于更好地理解中风的病理生理学,但将这些知识转化为有效的治疗方法在很大程度上失败了。缺血性卒中唯一有效的治疗方法是用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)溶解凝块,使闭塞的血管快速再通。然而,中风对血管功能也有不利影响,可引起继发性脑损伤,并限制依赖于血管通畅的治疗。在大脑中动脉(MCA),缺血/再灌注(I/R)导致肌原性张力丧失,血管麻痹和内皮功能障碍,可导致自我调节功能丧失。相反,脑实质小动脉在I/R期间保持相当大的张力,这可能有助于梗塞扩展到半暗区。微血管失调也发生在缺血性中风时,引起水肿和出血,加重原发损伤。随着I/R持续时间的延长,血管缺血性损伤是进行性的。早期缺血再灌注对脑卒中预后有利,但在较长时间的I/R后,可能损害血管功能并加剧缺血性损伤。本文综述了I/R对脑内不同血管节段结构和功能的影响,并重点介绍了一些更有希望的血管保护靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信