Knowledge, attitudes and practice survey about antimicrobial resistance and prescribing among physicians in a hospital setting in Lima, Peru.

Coralith García, Liz P Llamocca, Krystel García, Aimee Jiménez, Frine Samalvides, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Jan Jacobs
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and practice survey about antimicrobial resistance and prescribing among physicians in a hospital setting in Lima, Peru.","authors":"Coralith García,&nbsp;Liz P Llamocca,&nbsp;Krystel García,&nbsp;Aimee Jiménez,&nbsp;Frine Samalvides,&nbsp;Eduardo Gotuzzo,&nbsp;Jan Jacobs","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-11-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Misuse of antimicrobials (AMs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are global concerns. The present study evaluated knowledge, attitudes and practices about AMR and AM prescribing among medical doctors in two large public hospitals in Lima, Peru, a middle-income country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 256 participants completed the questionnaire (response rate 82%). Theoretical knowledge was good (mean score of 6 ± 1.3 on 7 questions) in contrast to poor awareness (< 33%) of local AMR rates of key-pathogens. Participants strongly agreed that AMR is a problem worldwide (70%) and in Peru (65%), but less in their own practice (22%). AM overuse was perceived both for the community (96%) and the hospital settings (90%). Patients' pressure to prescribing AMs was considered as contributing to AM overuse in the community (72%) more than in the hospital setting (50%). Confidence among AM prescribing was higher among attending physicians (82%) compared to residents (30%, p < 0.001%). Sources of information considered as very useful/useful included pocket-based AM prescribing guidelines (69%) and internet sources (62%). Fifty seven percent of participants regarded AMs in their hospitals to be of poor quality. Participants requested more AM prescribing educational programs (96%) and local AM guidelines (92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey revealed topics to address during future AM prescribing interventions such as dissemination of information about local AMR rates, promoting confidence in the quality of locally available AMs, redaction and dissemination of local AM guidelines and addressing the general public, and exploring the possibilities of internet-based training.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"11 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-11-18","citationCount":"128","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-11-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 128

Abstract

Background: Misuse of antimicrobials (AMs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are global concerns. The present study evaluated knowledge, attitudes and practices about AMR and AM prescribing among medical doctors in two large public hospitals in Lima, Peru, a middle-income country.

Methods: Cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire

Results: A total of 256 participants completed the questionnaire (response rate 82%). Theoretical knowledge was good (mean score of 6 ± 1.3 on 7 questions) in contrast to poor awareness (< 33%) of local AMR rates of key-pathogens. Participants strongly agreed that AMR is a problem worldwide (70%) and in Peru (65%), but less in their own practice (22%). AM overuse was perceived both for the community (96%) and the hospital settings (90%). Patients' pressure to prescribing AMs was considered as contributing to AM overuse in the community (72%) more than in the hospital setting (50%). Confidence among AM prescribing was higher among attending physicians (82%) compared to residents (30%, p < 0.001%). Sources of information considered as very useful/useful included pocket-based AM prescribing guidelines (69%) and internet sources (62%). Fifty seven percent of participants regarded AMs in their hospitals to be of poor quality. Participants requested more AM prescribing educational programs (96%) and local AM guidelines (92%).

Conclusions: This survey revealed topics to address during future AM prescribing interventions such as dissemination of information about local AMR rates, promoting confidence in the quality of locally available AMs, redaction and dissemination of local AM guidelines and addressing the general public, and exploring the possibilities of internet-based training.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

秘鲁利马一家医院医生对抗菌素耐药性和处方的知识、态度和做法调查
背景:抗菌素滥用(AMs)和耐药性(AMR)是全球性问题。本研究评估了中等收入国家秘鲁利马两家大型公立医院医生关于抗微生物药物耐药性和抗微生物药物处方的知识、态度和做法。方法:采用自填问卷进行横断面研究。结果:共256名参与者完成问卷调查,回复率82%。理论知识较好(7道题平均得分为6±1.3),而对当地关键病原菌AMR率的认识较差(< 33%)。参与者强烈同意抗菌素耐药性是世界范围内(70%)和秘鲁(65%)的一个问题,但在他们自己的实践中较少(22%)。社区(96%)和医院(90%)都认为AM过度使用。在社区(72%)和医院(50%)中,患者对处方人工智能药物的压力被认为是造成人工智能药物过度使用的原因。主治医师对AM处方的信心(82%)高于住院医师(30%,p < 0.001%)。被认为非常有用的信息来源包括基于口袋的AM处方指南(69%)和互联网来源(62%)。57%的参与者认为他们医院的急救医生质量很差。参与者要求更多的AM处方教育计划(96%)和当地AM指南(92%)。结论:该调查揭示了未来AM处方干预中需要解决的问题,如传播有关当地AMR率的信息,提高对当地可获得的AM质量的信心,修订和传播当地AM指南并解决公众问题,以及探索基于互联网的培训的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信