Epoetin Theta with a New Dosing Schedule in Anaemic Cancer Patients Receiving Nonplatinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Sergei A. Tjulandin MD, Peter Bias MD, Reiner Elsässer Dipl. Stat, Beate Gertz PhD, Erich Kohler PhD, Anton Buchner PhD
{"title":"Epoetin Theta with a New Dosing Schedule in Anaemic Cancer Patients Receiving Nonplatinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Sergei A. Tjulandin MD,&nbsp;Peter Bias MD,&nbsp;Reiner Elsässer Dipl. Stat,&nbsp;Beate Gertz PhD,&nbsp;Erich Kohler PhD,&nbsp;Anton Buchner PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-5174.2011.00035.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Introduction. </b> Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) is used to treat symptomatic anaemia due to chemotherapy. A new r-HuEPO, Epoetin theta (Eporatio<sup>®</sup>), was investigated and compared to placebo in a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in adult cancer patients receiving nonplatinum-based chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the responder rate (complete haemoglobin (Hb) response, i.e., Hb increase ≥2 g/dl) without the benefit of a transfusion within the previous 4 weeks.</p><p><b>Research Design and Methods. </b> 186 patients were randomised to s.c. treatment for 12 weeks with either Epoetin theta (N = 95) or placebo (N = 91). The starting dose was 20,000 IU once weekly Epoetin theta or placebo.</p><p><b>Results. </b> The incidence of complete Hb responders was significantly higher in the Epoetin theta group than in the placebo group (72.6 vs. 25.3%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). More patients in the placebo group than in the Epoetin theta group received blood transfusions after randomisation (23 patients, 25.3% vs. 13 patients, 13.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.0277). The majority of patients with a complete Hb response had 20,000 IU/week as their maximum dose prior to response, indicating that a dose of 20,000 IU is an appropriate starting dose. The overall frequencies of adverse events (AEs) were similar in both treatment groups. Hypertension was the only AE that was more frequent in the Epoetin theta group compared to the placebo group (8.4 vs. 1.1%).</p><p><b>Conclusions. </b> Epoetin theta showed a superior efficacy to placebo in terms of complete Hb response without blood transfusion within the previous 4 weeks. Treatment with Epoetin theta resulted in a statistically significant increase in mean haemoglobin levels compared to placebo. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Drug Information","volume":"4 3","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2011.00035.x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Drug Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2011.00035.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Introduction. Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) is used to treat symptomatic anaemia due to chemotherapy. A new r-HuEPO, Epoetin theta (Eporatio®), was investigated and compared to placebo in a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in adult cancer patients receiving nonplatinum-based chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the responder rate (complete haemoglobin (Hb) response, i.e., Hb increase ≥2 g/dl) without the benefit of a transfusion within the previous 4 weeks.

Research Design and Methods. 186 patients were randomised to s.c. treatment for 12 weeks with either Epoetin theta (N = 95) or placebo (N = 91). The starting dose was 20,000 IU once weekly Epoetin theta or placebo.

Results. The incidence of complete Hb responders was significantly higher in the Epoetin theta group than in the placebo group (72.6 vs. 25.3%, P < 0.0001). More patients in the placebo group than in the Epoetin theta group received blood transfusions after randomisation (23 patients, 25.3% vs. 13 patients, 13.7%, P = 0.0277). The majority of patients with a complete Hb response had 20,000 IU/week as their maximum dose prior to response, indicating that a dose of 20,000 IU is an appropriate starting dose. The overall frequencies of adverse events (AEs) were similar in both treatment groups. Hypertension was the only AE that was more frequent in the Epoetin theta group compared to the placebo group (8.4 vs. 1.1%).

Conclusions. Epoetin theta showed a superior efficacy to placebo in terms of complete Hb response without blood transfusion within the previous 4 weeks. Treatment with Epoetin theta resulted in a statistically significant increase in mean haemoglobin levels compared to placebo. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.

Abstract Image

在接受非铂类化疗的贫血癌症患者中,新给药方案的Epoetin Theta:一项随机对照试验
介绍。重组人促红细胞生成素(r-HuEPO)用于治疗化疗引起的症状性贫血。一项随机双盲临床试验研究了一种新的r-HuEPO, Epoetin theta (Eporatio®),并在接受非铂类化疗的成人癌症患者中与安慰剂进行了比较。主要疗效终点是在过去4周内无输血获益的应答率(完全血红蛋白(Hb)应答,即Hb增加≥2 g/dl)。研究设计和方法:186例患者随机分为两组,分别使用Epoetin theta (N = 95)或安慰剂(N = 91)进行为期12周的s.c.治疗。起始剂量为20,000 IU,每周一次,促生成素或安慰剂。Epoetin theta组的完全Hb反应发生率显著高于安慰剂组(72.6 vs 25.3%, P < 0.0001)。随机分组后,安慰剂组接受输血的患者多于Epoetin组(23例,25.3% vs. 13例,13.7%,P = 0.0277)。大多数Hb完全反应的患者在反应前的最大剂量为20,000 IU/周,这表明20,000 IU的剂量是合适的起始剂量。在两个治疗组中,不良事件(ae)的总频率相似。与安慰剂组相比,高血压是唯一更常见的AE (8.4 vs 1.1%)。在前4周内不输血的完全Hb反应方面,Epoetin theta显示出优于安慰剂的疗效。与安慰剂相比,Epoetin治疗导致平均血红蛋白水平显著增加。在两个治疗组中,不良事件的总体频率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信