[The usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome--a review].

Andrzej Zyluk, Piotr Puchalski, Przemysław Nawrot
{"title":"[The usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome--a review].","authors":"Andrzej Zyluk,&nbsp;Piotr Puchalski,&nbsp;Przemysław Nawrot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasonography has had relatively long history (approximately 20 years) in the diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome, but as late as in last decade has gained greater popularity and has been applied in the clinic. Numerous studies revealed that the most accurate parameter indicating the compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel is the cross sectional area of the nerve at the inlet level. However, contrary to the nerve conduction studies, sonographic measurements are characterised by wide range of normal, physiological (a mean of 4.8 to 9.7 mm2), pathological, indicating compression of the nerve values (a mean of 10.7 to 16.8 mm2) and cut-off coefficients between normal state and pathology (a mean of 6.5 to 14 mm2). Sensitivity and specificity of the method, calculated for different cut-off values is estimated of 60-90%, hence, is around 10% lower than the same parameters of electrophysiological tests. Difficulties in standardisation of cross-sectional nerve area (considered a classical parameter) motivated investigators to searching other indicators of the nerve compression, e.g. \"wrist-forearm\" ratio, which is a quotient of the cross sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet and 12-15 proximally at the forearm level. Some studies showed greater accuracy of this ratio, allowing to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of more than 95%. After review of the studies, authors critically conclude that actual state of art does not justify considering ultrasonography a valuable additional test in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome and for routine use this technique in typical cases. Ultrasonography may be useful in patients with doubtful clinical picture, as a screening test, as well as in suspicion of intra-tunnel pathology. However, in atypical clinical situation, nerve conduction studies provide significantly more information on the function of the median nerve, presence of more than one compression sites or other pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":75702,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","volume":"75 6","pages":"385-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultrasonography has had relatively long history (approximately 20 years) in the diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome, but as late as in last decade has gained greater popularity and has been applied in the clinic. Numerous studies revealed that the most accurate parameter indicating the compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel is the cross sectional area of the nerve at the inlet level. However, contrary to the nerve conduction studies, sonographic measurements are characterised by wide range of normal, physiological (a mean of 4.8 to 9.7 mm2), pathological, indicating compression of the nerve values (a mean of 10.7 to 16.8 mm2) and cut-off coefficients between normal state and pathology (a mean of 6.5 to 14 mm2). Sensitivity and specificity of the method, calculated for different cut-off values is estimated of 60-90%, hence, is around 10% lower than the same parameters of electrophysiological tests. Difficulties in standardisation of cross-sectional nerve area (considered a classical parameter) motivated investigators to searching other indicators of the nerve compression, e.g. "wrist-forearm" ratio, which is a quotient of the cross sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet and 12-15 proximally at the forearm level. Some studies showed greater accuracy of this ratio, allowing to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of more than 95%. After review of the studies, authors critically conclude that actual state of art does not justify considering ultrasonography a valuable additional test in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome and for routine use this technique in typical cases. Ultrasonography may be useful in patients with doubtful clinical picture, as a screening test, as well as in suspicion of intra-tunnel pathology. However, in atypical clinical situation, nerve conduction studies provide significantly more information on the function of the median nerve, presence of more than one compression sites or other pathology.

超声检查在腕管综合征诊断中的应用综述
超声检查诊断腕管综合征已有较长的历史(约20年),但直到近十年才逐渐普及并应用于临床。大量研究表明,指示正中神经在腕管中受压最准确的参数是神经入口水平的横截面积。然而,与神经传导研究相反,超声测量的特点是范围广泛的正常,生理(平均4.8至9.7 mm2),病理,表明神经值的压迫(平均10.7至16.8 mm2)和正常状态和病理之间的截止系数(平均6.5至14 mm2)。根据不同的截止值计算,该方法的灵敏度和特异性估计为60-90%,因此,比相同参数的电生理测试低10%左右。神经横截面积(被认为是一个经典参数)标准化的困难促使研究者寻找神经压迫的其他指标,例如:“腕-前臂”比值,即腕管入口正中神经横截面积与近端前臂水平12-15的比值。一些研究表明,这一比例的准确性更高,可以获得95%以上的敏感性和特异性。在回顾研究后,作者批判性地得出结论,目前的技术水平不足以证明超声检查是诊断腕管综合征的一种有价值的附加检查,也不足以证明超声检查在典型病例中的常规应用。超声检查在临床表现可疑的患者中可作为筛查试验,也可用于怀疑隧道内病理。然而,在非典型的临床情况下,神经传导研究可以提供更多关于正中神经功能、多个压迫部位或其他病理的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信