[Comparative study and sensitivity tests of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains using nitrate reductase and absolute concentrations methods].

Daniela Homorodean, Andreea Melinda Jodal, Mihaela Stoian
{"title":"[Comparative study and sensitivity tests of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains using nitrate reductase and absolute concentrations methods].","authors":"Daniela Homorodean,&nbsp;Andreea Melinda Jodal,&nbsp;Mihaela Stoian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The alarming increase of cases of tuberculosis with resistant germs renders compulsory the orientation towards rapid and cheap methods that would allow large-scale testing of mycobacterial strains.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evaluation of the performances of two phenotypic methods for mycobacteria sensitivity testing. nitrate reductase and absolute concentrations.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>In two different laboratories we tested the same set of 20 mycobacterial strains from the 2008/2009 international panel and an additional 10 strains isolated in the second laboratory, using the absolute concentration method as standard and the nitrate reductase method, both using Lowenstein Jensen medium with rifampicine and isoniaside incorporated The results obtained in both laboratories are concordant for both methods and show sensitivity and specificity of 100% for nitrate reductase method compared to absolute concentration method The results obtained using the two methods in the two laboratories also showed a 100% reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nitrate reductase method is easy to perform and to acknowledge. It does not require special equipment, besides what is usually found in the laboratory. It showed a 100% sensitivity and specificity. The 100% reproducibility and repetability of results can represent arguments for a possible use of the methods in all the laboratories belonging to the national network of mycobacteriology laboratories, in order to screen for multiresistant strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":77026,"journal":{"name":"Bacteriologia, virusologia, parazitologia, epidemiologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)","volume":"55 2","pages":"109-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bacteriologia, virusologia, parazitologia, epidemiologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The alarming increase of cases of tuberculosis with resistant germs renders compulsory the orientation towards rapid and cheap methods that would allow large-scale testing of mycobacterial strains.

Aim: Evaluation of the performances of two phenotypic methods for mycobacteria sensitivity testing. nitrate reductase and absolute concentrations.

Material and method: In two different laboratories we tested the same set of 20 mycobacterial strains from the 2008/2009 international panel and an additional 10 strains isolated in the second laboratory, using the absolute concentration method as standard and the nitrate reductase method, both using Lowenstein Jensen medium with rifampicine and isoniaside incorporated The results obtained in both laboratories are concordant for both methods and show sensitivity and specificity of 100% for nitrate reductase method compared to absolute concentration method The results obtained using the two methods in the two laboratories also showed a 100% reproducibility.

Conclusions: Nitrate reductase method is easy to perform and to acknowledge. It does not require special equipment, besides what is usually found in the laboratory. It showed a 100% sensitivity and specificity. The 100% reproducibility and repetability of results can represent arguments for a possible use of the methods in all the laboratories belonging to the national network of mycobacteriology laboratories, in order to screen for multiresistant strains.

[硝酸还原酶法和绝对浓度法对结核分枝杆菌的比较研究及敏感性试验]。
导言:耐药菌结核病例的惊人增长使得必须采用快速和廉价的方法,以便对分枝杆菌菌株进行大规模检测。目的:评价分枝杆菌敏感性检测的两种表型方法的性能。硝酸还原酶和绝对浓度。材料和方法:在两个不同的实验室中,我们使用绝对浓度法和硝酸还原酶法对来自2008/2009年国际小组的同一组20株分枝杆菌菌株和从第二个实验室分离的另外10株菌株进行了测试。两种方法均采用加入利福平和异烟叶皂苷的洛温斯坦延森培养基,两种实验室所得结果一致,硝酸还原酶法的灵敏度和特异性均为100%,与绝对浓度法相比,两种实验室所得结果均具有100%的重复性。结论:硝酸还原酶法操作简便,易于识别。它不需要特殊的设备,除了通常在实验室找到。其敏感性和特异性均为100%。结果100%的再现性和可重复性可以作为在属于国家分枝杆菌学实验室网络的所有实验室中使用这些方法以筛选多重耐药菌株的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信